H.R. 3371: Airline Safety and Pilot Training Improvement Act of 2009

July 30, 2009 at 9:47 am | Posted in Aviation Law | 22 Comments

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

H.R. 3371: Airline Safety and Pilot Training Improvement Act of 2009 was introduced on July 29, 2009 by Rep. Jerry Costello (D-IL12):

HR 3371 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3371

To amend title 49, United States Code, to improve airline safety and pilot training, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 29, 2009

Mr. COSTELLO (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. MICA, Mr. PETRI, Mr. CARNAHAN, Mr. COBLE, Mr. MCMAHON, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. FILNER, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. DENT, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. HALL of New York, Mr. COHEN, Mr. ALTMIRE, Mr. SCHAUER, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. LEE of New York, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. NORTON, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to improve airline safety and pilot training, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

(a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the ‘Airline Safety and Pilot Training Improvement Act of 2009’.

(b) Table of Contents-

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.

Sec. 2. Definitions.

Sec. 3. FAA Task Force on Air Carrier Safety and Pilot Training.

Sec. 4. Implementation of NTSB flight crewmember training recommendations.

Sec. 5. Secretary of Transportation responses to safety recommendations.

Sec. 6. FAA pilot records database.

Sec. 7. FAA rulemaking on training programs.

Sec. 8. Aviation safety inspectors and operational research analysts.

Sec. 9. Flight crewmember mentoring, professional development, and leadership.

Sec. 10. Flight crewmember screening and qualifications.

Sec. 11. Flight schools, flight education, and pilot academic training.

Sec. 12. Voluntary safety programs.

Sec. 13. ASAP and FOQA implementation plan.

Sec. 14. Safety management systems.

Sec. 15. Disclosure of air carriers operating flights for tickets sold for air transportation.

Sec. 16. Pilot fatigue.

Sec. 17. Flight crewmember pairing and crew resource management techniques.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

(a) Definitions- In this Act, the following definitions apply:

(1) ADVANCED QUALIFICATION PROGRAM- The term ‘advanced qualification program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120-54A, dated June 23, 2006, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

(2) AIR CARRIER- The term ‘air carrier’ has the meaning given that term in section 40102 of title 49, United States Code.

(3) AVIATION SAFETY ACTION PROGRAM- The term ‘aviation safety action program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120-66B, dated November 15, 2002, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

(4) FLIGHT CREWMEMBER- The term ‘flight crewmember’ has the meaning given that term in part 1.1 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

(5) FLIGHT OPERATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM- The term ‘flight operational quality assurance program’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120-82, dated April 12, 2004, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

(6) LINE OPERATIONS SAFETY AUDIT- The term ‘line operations safety audit’ means the procedure referenced by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120-90, dated April 27, 2006, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

(7) PART 121 AIR CARRIER- The term ‘part 121 air carrier’ means an air carrier that holds a certificate issued under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

(8) PART 135 AIR CARRIER- The term ‘part 135 air carrier’ means an air carrier that holds a certificate issued under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

SEC. 3. FAA TASK FORCE ON AIR CARRIER SAFETY AND PILOT TRAINING.

(a) Establishment- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish a special task force to be known as the ‘FAA Task Force on Air Carrier Safety and Pilot Training’ (in this section referred to as the ‘Task Force’).

(b) Composition- The Task Force shall consist of members appointed by the Administrator and shall include air carrier representatives, labor union representatives, and aviation safety experts with knowledge of foreign and domestic regulatory requirements for flight crewmember education and training.

(c) Duties- The duties of the Task Force shall include, at a minimum, evaluating best practices in the air carrier industry and providing recommendations in the following areas:

(1) Air carrier management responsibilities for flight crewmember education and support.

(2) Flight crewmember professional standards.

(3) Flight crewmember training standards and performance.

(4) Mentoring and information sharing between air carriers.

(d) Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and before the last day of each 180-day period thereafter until termination of the Task Force, the Task Force shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report detailing–

(1) the progress of the Task Force in identifying best practices in the air carrier industry;

(2) the progress of air carriers and labor unions in implementing the best practices identified by the Task Force;

(3) recommendations of the Task Force, if any, for legislative or regulatory actions;

(4) the progress of air carriers and labor unions in implementing training-related, nonregulatory actions recommended by the Administrator; and

(5) the progress of air carriers in developing specific programs to share safety data and ensure implementation of the most effective safety practices.

(e) Termination- The Task Force shall terminate on September 30, 2012.

(f) Applicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act- The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the Task Force.

SEC. 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF NTSB FLIGHT CREWMEMBER TRAINING RECOMMENDATIONS.

(a) Rulemaking Proceedings-

(1) STALL AND UPSET RECOGNITION AND RECOVERY TRAINING- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to require part 121 air carriers to provide flight crewmembers with ground training and flight training–

(A) to recognize and avoid a stall of an aircraft or, if not avoided, to recover from the stall; and

(B) to recognize and avoid an upset of an aircraft or, if not avoided, to execute such techniques as available data indicate are appropriate to recover from the upset in a given make, model, and series of aircraft.

(2) REMEDIAL TRAINING PROGRAMS- The Administrator shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to require part 121 air carriers to establish remedial training programs for flight crewmembers who have demonstrated performance deficiencies or experienced failures in the training environment.

(3) DEADLINES- The Administrator shall–

(A) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, issue a notice of proposed rulemaking under each of paragraphs (1) and (2); and

(B) not later than 24 months after the date of enactment of this Act, issue a final rule for the rulemaking in each of paragraphs (1) and (2).

(b) Stick Pusher Training and Weather Event Training-

(1) MULTIDISCIPLINARY PANEL- Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall convene a multidisciplinary panel of specialists in aircraft operations, flight crewmember training, human factors, and aviation safety to study and submit to the Administrator a report on methods to increase the familiarity of flight crewmembers with, and improve the response of flight crewmembers to, stick pusher systems, icing conditions, and microburst and windshear weather events.

(2) REPORT TO CONGRESS AND NTSB- Not later than one year after the date on which the Administrator convenes the panel, the Administrator shall–

(A) submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the National Transportation Safety Board a report based on the findings of the panel; and

(B) with respect to stick pusher systems, initiate appropriate actions to implement the recommendations of the panel.

(3) STICK PUSHER DEFINED- In this subsection, the term ‘stick pusher’ means a device that, at or near a stall, applies a nose down pitch force to an aircraft’s control columns to attempt to decrease the aircraft’s angle of attack.

SEC. 5. SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION RESPONSES TO SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS.

(a) In General- The first sentence of section 1135(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘to the National Transportation Safety Board’ after ‘shall give’.

(b) Air Carrier Safety Recommendations- Section 1135 of such title is amended–

(1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively; and

(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:

‘(c) Annual Report on Air Carrier Safety Recommendations-

‘(1) IN GENERAL- The Secretary shall submit to Congress and the Board, on an annual basis, a report on the recommendations made by the Board to the Secretary regarding air carrier operations conducted under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

‘(2) RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE COVERED- The report shall cover–

‘(A) any recommendation for which the Secretary has developed, or intends to develop, procedures to adopt the recommendation or part of the recommendation, but has yet to complete the procedures; and

‘(B) any recommendation for which the Secretary, in the preceding year, has issued a response under subsection (a)(2) or (a)(3) refusing to carry out all or part of the procedures to adopt the recommendation.

‘(3) CONTENTS-

‘(A) PLANS TO ADOPT RECOMMENDATIONS- For each recommendation of the Board described in paragraph (2)(A), the report shall contain–

‘(i) a description of the recommendation;

‘(ii) a description of the procedures planned for adopting the recommendation or part of the recommendation;

‘(iii) the proposed date for completing the procedures; and

‘(iv) if the Secretary has not met a deadline contained in a proposed timeline developed in connection with the recommendation under subsection (b), an explanation for not meeting the deadline.

‘(B) REFUSALS TO ADOPT RECOMMENDATIONS- For each recommendation of the Board described in paragraph (2)(B), the report shall contain–

‘(i) a description of the recommendation; and

‘(ii) a description of the reasons for the refusal to carry out all or part of the procedures to adopt the recommendation.’.

SEC. 6. FAA PILOT RECORDS DATABASE.

(a) Records of Employment of Pilot Applicants- Section 44703(h) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘(16) APPLICABILITY- This subsection shall cease to be effective on the date specified in regulations issued under subsection (i).’.

(b) Establishment of FAA Pilot Records Database- Section 44703 of such title is amended–

(1) by redesignating subsections (i) and (j) as subsections (j) and (k), respectively; and

(2) by inserting after subsection (h) the following:

‘(i) FAA Pilot Records Database-

‘(1) IN GENERAL- Before allowing an individual to begin service as a pilot, an air carrier shall access and evaluate, in accordance with the requirements of this subsection, information pertaining to the individual from the pilot records database established under paragraph (2).

‘(2) PILOT RECORDS DATABASE- The Administrator shall establish an electronic database (in this subsection referred to as the ‘database’) containing the following records:

‘(A) FAA RECORDS- From the Administrator–

‘(i) records that are maintained by the Administrator concerning current airman certificates, including airman medical certificates and associated type ratings and information on any limitations to those certificates and ratings;

‘(ii) records that are maintained by the Administrator concerning any failed attempt of an individual to pass a practical test required to obtain a certificate or type rating under part 61 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and

‘(iii) summaries of legal enforcement actions resulting in a finding by the Administrator of a violation of this title or a regulation prescribed or order issued under this title that was not subsequently overturned.

‘(B) AIR CARRIER AND OTHER RECORDS- From any air carrier or other person (except a branch of the Armed Forces, the National Guard, or a reserve component of the Armed Forces) that has employed an individual as a pilot of a civil or public aircraft, or from the trustee in bankruptcy for such air carrier or person–

‘(i) records pertaining to the individual that are maintained by the air carrier (other than records relating to flight time, duty time, or rest time) under regulations set forth in–

‘(I) section 121.683 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;

‘(II) paragraph (A) of section VI, appendix I, part 121 of such title;

‘(III) paragraph (A) of section IV, appendix J, part 121 of such title;

‘(IV) section 125.401 of such title; and

‘(V) section 135.63(a)(4) of such title; and

‘(ii) other records pertaining to the individual’s performance as a pilot that are maintained by the air carrier or person concerning–

‘(I) the training, qualifications, proficiency, or professional competence of the individual, including comments and evaluations made by a check airman designated in accordance with section 121.411, 125.295, or 135.337 of such title;

‘(II) any disciplinary action taken with respect to the individual that was not subsequently overturned; and

‘(III) any release from employment or resignation, termination, or disqualification with respect to employment.

‘(C) NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER RECORDS- In accordance with section 30305(b)(8) of this title, from the chief driver licensing official of a State, information concerning the motor vehicle driving record of the individual.

‘(3) WRITTEN CONSENT; RELEASE FROM LIABILITY- An air carrier–

‘(A) shall obtain the written consent of an individual before accessing records pertaining to the individual under paragraph (1); and

‘(B) may, notwithstanding any other provision of law or agreement to the contrary, require an individual with respect to whom the carrier is accessing records under paragraph (1) to execute a release from liability for any claim arising from accessing the records or the use of such records by the air carrier (other than a claim arising from furnishing information known to be false and maintained in violation of a criminal statute).

‘(4) REPORTING-

‘(A) REPORTING BY ADMINISTRATOR- The Administrator shall enter data described in paragraph (2)(A) into the database promptly to ensure that an individual’s records are current.

‘(B) REPORTING BY AIR CARRIERS AND OTHER PERSONS-

‘(i) IN GENERAL- Air carriers and other persons shall report data described in paragraphs (2)(B) and (2)(C) to the Administrator promptly for entry into the database.

‘(ii) DATA TO BE REPORTED- Air carriers and other persons shall report, at a minimum, under clause (i) the following data described in paragraph (2)(B):

‘(I) Records that are generated by the air carrier or other person after the date of enactment of this paragraph.

‘(II) Records that the air carrier or other person is maintaining, on such date of enactment, pursuant to subsection (h)(4).

‘(5) REQUIREMENT TO MAINTAIN RECORDS- The Administrator–

‘(A) shall maintain all records entered into the database under paragraph (2) pertaining to an individual until the date of receipt of notification that the individual is deceased; and

‘(B) may remove the individual’s records from the database after that date.

‘(6) RECEIPT OF CONSENT- The Administrator shall not permit an air carrier to access records pertaining to an individual from the database under paragraph (1) without the air carrier first demonstrating to the satisfaction of the Administrator that the air carrier has obtained the written consent of the individual.

‘(7) RIGHT OF PILOT TO REVIEW CERTAIN RECORDS AND CORRECT INACCURACIES- Notwithstanding any other provision of law or agreement, the Administrator, upon receipt of written request from an individual–

‘(A) shall make available, not later than 30 days after the date of the request, to the individual for review all records referred to in paragraph (2) pertaining to the individual; and

‘(B) shall provide the individual with a reasonable opportunity to submit written comments to correct any inaccuracies contained in the records.

‘(8) REASONABLE CHARGES FOR PROCESSING REQUESTS AND FURNISHING COPIES- The Administrator may establish a reasonable charge for the cost of processing a request under paragraph (1) or (7) and for the cost of furnishing copies of requested records under paragraph (7).

‘(9) PRIVACY PROTECTIONS-

‘(A) USE OF RECORDS- An air carrier that accesses records pertaining to an individual under paragraph (1) may use the records only to assess the qualifications of the individual in deciding whether or not to hire the individual as a pilot. The air carrier shall take such actions as may be necessary to protect the privacy of the individual and the confidentiality of the records accessed, including ensuring that information contained in the records is not divulged to any individual that is not directly involved in the hiring decision.

‘(B) DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION-

‘(i) IN GENERAL- Except as provided by clause (ii), information collected by the Administrator under paragraph (2) shall be exempt from the disclosure requirements of section 552 of title 5.

‘(ii) EXCEPTIONS- Clause (i) shall not apply to–

‘(I) de-identified, summarized information to explain the need for changes in policies and regulations;

‘(II) information to correct a condition that compromises safety;

‘(III) information to carry out a criminal investigation or prosecution;

‘(IV) information to comply with section 44905, regarding information about threats to civil aviation; and

‘(V) such information as the Administrator determines necessary, if withholding the information would not be consistent with the safety responsibilities of the Federal Aviation Administration.

‘(10) PERIODIC REVIEW- Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this paragraph, and at least once every 3 years thereafter, the Administrator shall transmit to Congress a statement that contains, taking into account recent developments in the aviation industry–

‘(A) recommendations by the Administrator concerning proposed changes to Federal Aviation Administration records, air carrier records, and other records required to be included in the database under paragraph (2); or

‘(B) reasons why the Administrator does not recommend any proposed changes to the records referred to in subparagraph (A).

‘(11) REGULATIONS FOR PROTECTION AND SECURITY OF RECORDS- The Administrator shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary–

‘(A) to protect and secure–

‘(i) the personal privacy of any individual whose records are accessed under paragraph (1); and

‘(ii) the confidentiality of those records; and

‘(B) to preclude the further dissemination of records received under paragraph (1) by the person who accessed the records.

‘(12) GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION- Notwithstanding paragraph (1), an air carrier may allow an individual to begin service as a pilot, without first obtaining information described in paragraph (2)(B) from the database pertaining to the individual, if–

‘(A) the air carrier has made a documented good faith attempt to access the information from the database; and

‘(B) has received written notice from the Administrator that the information is not contained in the database because the individual was employed by an air carrier or other person that no longer exists or by a foreign government or other entity that has not provided the information to the database.

‘(13) LIMITATIONS ON ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO RECORDS-

‘(A) ACCESS BY INDIVIDUALS DESIGNATED BY AIR CARRIERS- For the purpose of increasing timely and efficient access to records described in paragraph (2), the Administrator may allow, under terms established by the Administrator, an individual designated by an air carrier to have electronic access to the database.

‘(B) TERMS- The terms established by the Administrator under subparagraph (A) for allowing a designated individual to have electronic access to the database shall limit such access to instances in which information in the database is required by the designated individual in making a hiring decision concerning a pilot applicant and shall require that the designated individual provide assurances satisfactory to the Administrator that–

‘(i) the designated individual has received the written consent of the pilot applicant to access the information; and

‘(ii) information obtained using such access will not be used for any purpose other than making the hiring decision.

‘(14) AUTHORIZED EXPENDITURES- Out of amounts appropriated under section 106(k)(1), there is authorized to be expended to carry out this subsection such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012.

‘(15) REGULATIONS-

‘(A) IN GENERAL- The Administrator shall issue regulations to carry out this subsection.

‘(B) EFFECTIVE DATE- The regulations shall specify the date on which the requirements of this subsection take effect and the date on which the requirements of subsection (h) cease to be effective.

‘(C) EXCEPTIONS- Notwithstanding subparagraph (B)–

‘(i) the Administrator shall begin to establish the database under paragraph (2) not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this paragraph;

‘(ii) the Administrator shall maintain records in accordance with paragraph (5) beginning on the date of enactment of this paragraph; and

‘(iii) air carriers and other persons shall maintain records to be reported to the database under paragraph (4)(B) beginning on such date of enactment.’.

(c) Conforming Amendments-

(1) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY; PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW- Section 44703(j) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section) is amended–

(A) in the subsection heading by striking ‘Limitation’ and inserting ‘Limitations’;

(B) in paragraph (1)–

(i) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) by striking ‘paragraph (2)’ and inserting ‘subsection (h)(2) or (i)(3)’;

(ii) in subparagraph (A) by inserting ‘or accessing the records of that individual under subsection (i)(1)’ before the semicolon; and

(iii) in the matter following subparagraph (D) by striking ‘subsection (h)’ and inserting ‘subsection (h) or (i)’;

(C) in paragraph (2) by striking ‘subsection (h)’ and inserting ‘subsection (h) or (i)’;

(D) in paragraph (3), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘or who furnished information to the database established under subsection (i)(2)’ after ‘subsection (h)(1)’; and

(E) by adding at the end the following:

‘(4) PROHIBITION ON ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS AGAINST AIR CARRIERS-

‘(A) HIRING DECISIONS- An air carrier may refuse to hire an individual as a pilot if the individual did not provide written consent for the air carrier to receive records under subsection (h)(2)(A) or (i)(3)(A) or did not execute the release from liability requested under subsection (h)(2)(B) or (i)(3)(B).

‘(B) ACTIONS AND PROCEEDINGS- No action or proceeding may be brought against an air carrier by or on behalf of an individual who has applied for or is seeking a position as a pilot with the air carrier if the air carrier refused to hire the individual after the individual did not provide written consent for the air carrier to receive records under subsection (h)(2)(A) or (i)(3)(A) or did not execute a release from liability requested under subsection (h)(2)(B) or (i)(3)(B).’.

(2) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION- Section 44703(k) (as redesignated by subsection (b)(1) of this section) is amended by striking ‘subsection (h)’ and inserting ‘subsection (h) or (i)’.

SEC. 7. FAA RULEMAKING ON TRAINING PROGRAMS.

(a) Completion of Rulemaking on Training Programs- Not later than 14 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue a final rule with respect to the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on January 12, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 1280; relating to training programs for flight crewmembers and aircraft dispatchers).

(b) Expert Panel To Review Part 121 and Part 135 Training Hours-

(1) ESTABLISHMENT- Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall convene a multidisciplinary expert panel comprised of, at a minimum, air carrier representatives, training facility representatives, instructional design experts, aircraft manufacturers, safety organization representatives, and labor union representatives.

(2) ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS- The panel shall assess and make recommendations concerning–

(A) the best methods and optimal time needed for flight crewmembers of part 121 air carriers and flight crewmembers of part 135 air carriers to master aircraft systems, maneuvers, procedures, take offs and landings, and crew coordination;

(B) the optimal length of time between training events for such crewmembers, including recurrent training events; and

(C) the best methods to reliably evaluate mastery by such crewmembers of aircraft systems, maneuvers, procedures, take offs and landings, and crew coordination.

(3) REPORT- Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the National Transportation Safety Board a report based on the findings of the panel.

SEC. 8. AVIATION SAFETY INSPECTORS AND OPERATIONAL RESEARCH ANALYSTS.

(a) Review by DOT Inspector General- Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation shall conduct a review of aviation safety inspectors and operational research analysts of the Federal Aviation Administration assigned to part 121 air carriers and submit to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration a report on the results of the review.

(b) Purposes- The purpose of the review shall be, at a minimum–

(1) to review the level of the Administration’s oversight of each part 121 air carrier;

(2) to make recommendations to ensure that each part 121 air carrier is receiving an equivalent level of oversight;

(3) to assess the number and level of experience of aviation safety inspectors assigned to such carriers;

(4) to evaluate how the Administration is making assignments of aviation safety inspectors to such carriers;

(5) to review various safety inspector oversight programs, including the geographic inspector program;

(6) to evaluate the adequacy of the number of operational research analysts assigned to each part 121 air carrier;

(7) to evaluate the surveillance responsibilities of aviation safety inspectors, including en route inspections;

(8) to evaluate whether inspectors are able to effectively use data sources, such as the Safety Performance Analysis System and the Air Transportation Oversight System, to assist in targeting oversight of air carriers;

(9) to assess the feasibility of establishment by the Administration of a comprehensive repository of information that encompasses multiple Administration data sources and allowing access by aviation safety inspectors and operational research analysts to assist in the oversight of part 121 air carriers; and

(10) to conduct such other analyses as the Inspector General considers relevant to the purpose of the review.

(c) Report to Congress- Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of the report submitted under subsection (a), the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report–

(1) that specifies which, if any, policy changes recommended by the Inspector General under this section the Administrator intends to adopt and implement;

(2) that includes an explanation of how the Administrator plans to adopt and implement such policy changes; and

(3) in any case in which the Administrator does not intend to adopt a policy change recommended by the Inspector General, that includes an explanation of the reasons for the decision not to adopt and implement the policy change.

SEC. 9. FLIGHT CREWMEMBER MENTORING, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LEADERSHIP.

(a) Rulemaking Proceeding-

(1) IN GENERAL- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to require each part 121 air carrier to take the following actions:

(A) Establish flight crewmember mentoring programs under which the air carrier will pair highly experienced flight crewmembers who will serve as mentor pilots and be paired with newly employed flight crewmembers. Mentor pilots shall receive, at a minimum, specific instruction on techniques for instilling and reinforcing the highest standards of technical performance, airmanship, and professionalism in newly employed flight crewmembers.

(B) Establish flight crewmember professional development committees made up of air carrier management and labor union or professional association representatives to develop, administer, and oversee formal mentoring programs of the carrier to assist flight crewmembers to reach their maximum potential as safe, seasoned, and proficient flight crewmembers.

(C) Establish or modify training programs to accommodate substantially different levels and types of flight experience by newly employed flight crewmembers.

(D) Establish or modify training programs for second-in-command flight crewmembers attempting to qualify as pilot-in-command flight crewmembers for the first time in a specific aircraft type and ensure that such programs include leadership and command training.

(E) Ensure that recurrent training for pilots in command includes leadership and command training.

(F) Such other actions as the Administrator determines appropriate to enhance flight crewmember professional development.

(2) COMPLIANCE WITH STERILE COCKPIT RULE- Leadership and command training described in paragraphs (1)(D) and (1)(E) shall include instruction on compliance with flight crewmember duties under part 121.542 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

(3) STREAMLINED PROGRAM REVIEW-

(A) IN GENERAL- As part of the rulemaking required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall establish a streamlined process for part 121 air carriers that have in effect, as of the date of enactment of this Act, the programs required by paragraph (1).

(B) EXPEDITED APPROVALS- Under the streamlined process, the Administrator shall–

(i) review the programs of such part 121 air carriers to determine whether the programs meet the requirements set forth in the final rule referred to in subsection (b)(2); and

(ii) expedite the approval of the programs that the Administrator determines meet such requirements.

(b) Deadlines- The Administrator shall issue–

(1) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a notice of proposed rulemaking under subsection (a); and

(2) not later than 24 months after such date of enactment, a final rule under subsection (a).

SEC. 10. FLIGHT CREWMEMBER SCREENING AND QUALIFICATIONS.

(a) Requirements-

(1) RULEMAKING PROCEEDING- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to require part 121 air carriers to develop and implement means and methods for ensuring that flight crewmembers have proper qualifications and experience.

(2) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS-

(A) PROSPECTIVE FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS- Rules issued under paragraph (1) shall ensure that prospective flight crewmembers undergo comprehensive pre-employment screening, including an assessment of the skills, aptitudes, airmanship, and suitability of each applicant for a position as a flight crewmember in terms of functioning effectively in the air carrier’s operational environment.

(B) ALL FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS- Rules issued under paragraph (1) shall ensure that, after the date that is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, all flight crewmembers–

(i) have obtained an airline transport pilot license under part 61 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and

(ii) have appropriate multi-engine aircraft flight experience, as determined by the Administrator.

(b) Deadlines- The Administrator shall issue–

(1) not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a notice of proposed rulemaking under subsection (a); and

(2) not later than 24 months after such date of enactment, a final rule under subsection (a).

SEC. 11. FLIGHT SCHOOLS, FLIGHT EDUCATION, AND PILOT ACADEMIC TRAINING.

(a) GAO Study- The Comptroller General shall conduct a comprehensive study of flight schools, flight education, and academic training requirements for certification of an individual as a pilot.

(b) Minimum Contents of Study- The study shall include, at a minimum–

(1) an assessment of the Federal Aviation Administration’s oversight of flight schools;

(2) an assessment of the Administration’s academic training requirements in effect on the date of enactment of this Act as compared to flight education provided to a pilot by accredited 2- and 4-year universities;

(3) a comparison of the academic training requirements for pilots in the United States to the academic training requirements for pilots in other countries;

(4) a determination and description of any improvements that may be needed in the Administration’s academic training requirements for pilots;

(5) an assessment of student financial aid and loan options available to individuals interested in enrolling at a flight school for both academic and flight hour training;

(6) an assessment of the Federal Aviation Administration’s oversight of general aviation flight schools that offer or would like to offer training programs under part 142 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations; and

(7) an assessment of whether compliance with the English speaking requirements applicable to pilots under part 61 of such title is adequately tested and enforced.

(c) Report- Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the study.

SEC. 12. VOLUNTARY SAFETY PROGRAMS.

(a) Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate a report on the aviation safety action program, the flight operational quality assurance program, the line operations safety audit, and the advanced qualification program.

(b) Contents- The report shall include–

(1) a list of–

(A) which air carriers are using one or more of the voluntary safety programs referred to in subsection (a); and

(B) the voluntary safety programs each air carrier is using;

(2) if an air carrier is not using one or more of the voluntary safety programs–

(A) a list of such programs the carrier is not using; and

(B) the reasons the carrier is not using each such program;

(3) if an air carrier is using one or more of the voluntary safety programs, an explanation of the benefits and challenges of using each such program;

(4) a detailed analysis of how the Administration is using data derived from each of the voluntary safety programs as safety analysis and accident or incident prevention tools and a detailed plan on how the Administration intends to expand data analysis of such programs;

(5) an explanation of–

(A) where the data derived from such programs is stored;

(B) how the data derived from such programs is protected and secured; and

(C) what data analysis processes air carriers are implementing to ensure the effective use of the data derived from such programs;

(6) a description of the extent to which aviation safety inspectors are able to review data derived from such programs to enhance their oversight responsibilities;

(7) a description of how the Administration plans to incorporate operational trends identified under such programs into the air transport oversight system and other surveillance databases so that such system and databases are more effectively utilized;

(8) other plans to strengthen such programs, taking into account reviews of such programs by the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation; and

(9) such other matters as the Administrator determines are appropriate.

SEC. 13. ASAP AND FOQA IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.

(a) Development and Implementation Plan- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall develop and implement a plan to facilitate the establishment of an aviation safety action program and a flight operational quality assurance program by all part 121 air carriers.

(b) Matters To Be Considered- In developing the plan under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider–

(1) how the Administration can assist part 121 air carriers with smaller fleet sizes to derive benefit from establishing a flight operational quality assurance program;

(2) how part 121 air carriers with established aviation safety action and flight operational quality assurance programs can quickly begin to report data into the aviation safety information analysis sharing database; and

(3) how part 121 air carriers and aviation safety inspectors can better utilize data from such database as accident and incident prevention tools.

(c) Report- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation of the Senate a copy of the plan developed under subsection (a) and an explanation of how the Administration will implement the plan.

(d) Deadline for Beginning Implementation of Plan- Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall begin implementation of the plan developed under subsection (a).

SEC. 14. SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.

(a) Rulemaking- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct a rulemaking proceeding to require all part 121 air carriers to implement a safety management system.

(b) Matters to Consider- In conducting the rulemaking under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider including each of the following as a part of the safety management system:

(1) An aviation safety action program.

(2) A flight operational quality assurance program.

(3) A line operations safety audit.

(4) An advanced qualification program.

(c) Deadlines- The Administrator shall issue–

(1) not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a notice of proposed rulemaking under subsection (a); and

(2) not later than 24 months after the date of enactment of this Act, a final rule under subsection (a).

(d) Safety Management System Defined- In this section, the term ‘safety management system’ means the program established by the Federal Aviation Administration in Advisory Circular 120-92, dated June 22, 2006, including any subsequent revisions thereto.

SEC. 15. DISCLOSURE OF AIR CARRIERS OPERATING FLIGHTS FOR TICKETS SOLD FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION.

Section 41712 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘(c) Disclosure Requirement for Sellers of Tickets for Flights-

‘(1) IN GENERAL- It shall be an unfair or deceptive practice under subsection (a) for any ticket agent, air carrier, foreign air carrier, or other person offering to sell tickets for air transportation on a flight of an air carrier to not disclose, whether verbally in oral communication or in writing in written or electronic communication, prior to the purchase of a ticket–

‘(A) the name (including any business or corporate name) of the air carrier providing the air transportation; and

‘(B) if the flight has more than one flight segment, the name of each air carrier providing the air transportation for each such flight segment.

‘(2) INTERNET OFFERS- In the case of an offer to sell tickets described in paragraph (1) on an Internet Web site, disclosure of the information required by paragraph (1) shall be provided on the first display of the Web site following a search of a requested itinerary in a format that is easily visible to a viewer.’.

SEC. 16. PILOT FATIGUE.

(a) Flight and Duty Time Regulations-

(1) IN GENERAL- In accordance with paragraph (3), the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue regulations, based on the best available scientific information–

(A) to specify limitations on the hours of flight and duty time allowed for pilots to address problems relating to pilot fatigue; and

(B) to require part 121 air carriers to develop and implement fatigue risk management plans.

(2) MATTERS TO BE ADDRESSED- In conducting the rulemaking proceeding under this subsection, the Administrator shall consider and review the following:

(A) Time of day of flights in a duty period.

(B) Number of takeoff and landings in a duty period.

(C) Number of time zones crossed in a duty period.

(D) The impact of functioning in multiple time zones or on different daily schedules.

(E) Research conducted on fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms.

(F) Sleep and rest requirements recommended by the National Transportation Safety Board and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

(G) International standards regarding flight schedules and duty periods.

(H) Alternative procedures to facilitate alertness in the cockpit.

(I) Scheduling and attendance policies and practices, including sick leave.

(J) The effects of commuting, the means of commuting, and the length of the commute.

(K) Medical screening and treatment.

(L) Rest environments.

(M) Any other matters the Administrator considers appropriate.

(3) DEADLINES- The Administrator shall issue–

(A) not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, a notice of proposed rulemaking under subsection (a); and

(B) not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, a final rule under subsection (a).

(b) Fatigue Risk Management Plan-

(1) SUBMISSION OF FATIGUE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN BY PART 121 AIR CARRIERS- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section, each part 121 air carrier shall submit to the Administrator for review and approval a fatigue risk management plan.

(2) CONTENTS OF PLAN- A fatigue risk management plan submitted by a part 121 air carrier under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) Current flight time and duty period limitations.

(B) A rest scheme that enables the management of fatigue, including annual training to increase awareness of–

(i) fatigue;

(ii) the effects of fatigue on pilots; and

(iii) fatigue countermeasures.

(C) Development and use of a methodology that continually assesses the effectiveness of the program, including the ability of the program–

(i) to improve alertness; and

(ii) to mitigate performance errors.

(3) PLAN UPDATES- A part 121 air carrier shall update its fatigue risk management plan under paragraph (1) every 2 years and submit the update to the Administrator for review and approval.

(4) APPROVAL-

(A) INITIAL APPROVAL OR MODIFICATION- Not later than 9 months after the date of enactment of this section, the Administrator shall review and approve or require modification to fatigue risk management plans submitted under this subsection to ensure that pilots are not operating aircraft while fatigued.

(B) UPDATE APPROVAL OR MODIFICATION- Not later than 9 months after submission of a plan update under paragraph (3), the Administrator shall review and approve or require modification to such update.

(5) CIVIL PENALTIES- A violation of this subsection by a part 121 air carrier shall be treated as a violation of chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, for purposes of the application of civil penalties under chapter 463 of that title.

(6) LIMITATION ON APPLICABILITY- The requirements of this subsection shall cease to apply to a part 121 air carrier on and after the effective date of the regulations to be issued under subsection (a).

(c) Effect of Commuting on Fatigue-

(1) IN GENERAL- Not later than 3 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall enter into appropriate arrangements with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study of the effects of commuting on pilot fatigue and report its findings to the Administrator.

(2) STUDY- In conducting the study, the National Academy of Sciences shall consider–

(A) the prevalence of pilot commuting in the commercial air carrier industry, including the number and percentage of pilots who commute;

(B) information relating to commuting by pilots, including distances traveled, time zones crossed, time spent, and methods used;

(C) research on the impact of commuting on pilot fatigue, sleep, and circadian rhythms;

(D) commuting policies of commercial air carriers (including passenger and all-cargo air carriers), including pilot check-in requirements and sick leave and fatigue policies;

(E) post-conference materials from the Federal Aviation Administration’s June 2008 symposium entitled ‘Aviation Fatigue Management Symposium: Partnerships for Solutions’;

(F) Federal Aviation Administration and international policies and guidance regarding commuting; and

(G) any other matters as the Administrator considers appropriate.

(3) PRELIMINARY FINDINGS- Not later than 120 days after the date of entering into arrangements under paragraph (1), the National Academy of Sciences shall submit to the Administrator its preliminary findings under the study.

(4) REPORT- Not later than 6 months after the date of entering into arrangements under paragraph (1), the National Academy of Sciences shall submit to the Administrator a report containing its findings under the study and any recommendations for regulatory or administrative actions by the Federal Aviation Administration concerning commuting by pilots.

(5) RULEMAKING- Following receipt of the report of the National Academy of Sciences under paragraph (4), the Administrator shall–

(A) consider the findings and recommendations in the report; and

(B) update, as appropriate based on scientific data, regulations required by subsection (a) on flight and duty time.

(6) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 17. FLIGHT CREWMEMBER PAIRING AND CREW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES.

(a) Study- The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall conduct a study on aviation industry best practices with regard to flight crewmember pairing and crew resource management techniques.

(b) Report- Not later than one year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the study.

22 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. […] Posted by MachJ I just read this bill…it seems like half of it is requiring the FAA to enact new regulations regarding the most […]

  2. This Bill is TERRIFIC!!! It is about time we take these unqualified 250-400 hrs pilots out of jets. Take a look at these commuter crews the next time you are an airport that serves commuter airlines. The crews are tired looked, dogged, soiled uniforms, female pilots with no makeup/messy hair, scuffy shoes, grooming a mess. Yes, I toally agree with this move. I remember where I was at 250 hrs and I would never be qualifed to fly a RJ jet. Only cheating myself. Retired Corporate Captain.

    • If you are judging female pilots because they dont have on makeup then you are being unfair, i have spent my entire life and never wore makeup, it is not natural nor is is a requirement to be presentable or professional.

    • Frank, it sounds like you flew in a different era, times have changed. Piston radials are no longer at the forefront of technology. Flight training has evolved for the better with computer based training and state of the art simulators.
      You have no right to judge commuter airline pilots based off of looks alone. (didn’t you mother teach you about judging a book by its cover?)
      It is very possible that these pilots have received the best training and have completed it with lower times than back in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. New military pilots are sometimes as young as 18 and have maybe 40 hrs in a 172 as they start jet training. Some even fly solo in a multi-million dollar aircraft with less tha 200hrs total time.If the company has found them fit and qualified to fly their aircraft, and the FAA has issued them a certificate, then what difference does it make wheather they have 250 of 2250 hrs?
      As far as looking tired, that may be very true. These pilots are tasked with sometimes up to 8 flight cycles in a day. As a corporate pilot how many cycles did you do daily? I’m no doctor, but I do know that more cycles equals to more fatigue. I’m sure that these pilots don’t want to fly that much, but they have to in order to make a living. You talk about soiled uniforms and scuffy shoes, well it probably never occured to you that they are to busy and don’t make enough money to have uniforms laundered and pressed on the only one or two days off. While I do agree that looking the part of a pilot is important, not looking it doesn’t mean they are not qualified to perform the duties they are tasked with.
      So when you are about to catch a flight on a commuter plane and you see your pilot ungroomed with messy hair and scuffed shoes, does this mean that you won’t take that flight? Most people only care about a low fare and only that. Sounds like a little jealousy because you had to work at it harder when you were their age!

      • You are right on about Frank. Don’t judge before you know the facts. I have been in aviation for–ever it seems(40 years.) Presently LCA on B777. Have flown with every level of pilot that you can emagine over the years. I have trained from start thru ATP and on to specific big jet type ratings. So I will say with confidence, that the training that these young pilots receive today far exceeds that which we received in our younger years. And yes, Frank may not have been one that could have endured such training when he was 22. Some cannot meet the standards required to get hired by a regional with only a few hundred hours.

        The real issues at stake, with the problems within our airlines, can be found in the scheduling practices which are driven by the bean counters. We as consumers, are demanding pricing that has not inflated in 20 years, thus resulting in less money spent on specific training needs, human factors issues, fatigue problems, etc.

        Don’t blame the ills of the aviation industry on the age and lower times of many of our pilots. Certainly not on wrinkled shirts and pants at the end of a 12 hour work day. And I too have flown with some women that could have done a better job with the makeup, but that did not affect their ability to be great pilots!

    • No offense Frank, but when someone does something stupid while flying an airliner (Um, over flying the airport by 100 miles, yammering about the flight attendants sex lives, insert any example here….) and the flight goes down…. On a major, there’s a 100% chance that those pilots have their ATP.
      No, for now I’m just content to sit back with my 700tt and educate future pilots as a CFII. Am I still qualified to do that?

  3. Worst. Bill. Ever. Will signifcantly short change up and coming aviation professionals. It will drastically raise the cost of flight training, discouraging people to learn to fly, and only serve to exacerbate the already forecast upcoming pilot shortage. Graduates of FAR Part 141 flight training schools and academies are some of the finest and well trained aviators out there. Add on a Jet Equivalency Training program (required by most regionals who WERE hiring with 250 hours) and there is NO REASON that these new graduates shouldn’t be allowed to fly for an airline. This is possibly the worst, most detrimental bill for aviation ever. It has bogus, bureaucratic legislation such as a requirement for a “pilot mentoring program”…hello?! Ever heard of Initial Operating Experience, required at all airlines. It also calls for a “pilot records database”…hello?! Ever heard of the Pilot Records Improvement Act (PRIA)?! Call your legislators NOW and tell them to oppose this ridiculos bill.

    • Agreed. Building 1500 hours total time can be done in a year of instructing, but 500 hours of xc time is pretty hard to come by. As expensive as flight training is already, if passed, this bill will send that cost skyrocketing. I’m hoping that if they do push this through they at least consider providing the option of a frozen ATP for part 141 students.

    • This bill is great but it could be better. There has to be a minimum standard. The Airline Transport Pilot certificate is the minimum for flying AIRLINE passengers. Go fly freight in a baron, tow banners, FLIGHT INSTRUCT (very valuable). There are many options for the entry level pilot. It just doesn’t need to be in a jet or large turboprop flying the unknowing public. A shortage would be the best thing to happen. Pay would come up and quality will return to the cockpit. The best and the brightest. Do you really want the lowest bidder flying your wife and kids around. I don’t.

      • I’m calling shenanigans on this. I completely agree with J. Freye. I’m saying this as a flight student almost done with my commercial ticket. Under the absolute best of circumstances, this would add about 3 years before I could get into a regional operation and that’s under the best circumstances possible. Lets look at pay as well. Yes, regional pilots are drastically underpaid with starting salaries for an F.O. beginning at $16,000 a year. This being said, lets look at flight instructors. Under the best of circumstances a flight instructor might make about 22-25K a year. The bill requires 1500 hours with ATP. Everyone at the interview for a regional airline are going to be at theses minimums and most likely more. To be competitive in an interview, you should have much more than this bringing the total hours to something in the range of about 2200ish hours. If this monstrosity passes, it will keep good pilots out of the regionals longer, making below poverty line longer, and thus shortening their career in major carriers by a matter of years. The pay will not increase. The regional airlines have never made long term profits, just like many of their legacy partners. Why in the world would a company who doesn’t make profit increase pay to its employees? The answer simply is, they wont. Unless given a federal mandate and even further subsidies to the airlines by the government to cover it, the regional airlines will probably always under pay its employees. H. Davidson says this bill will create a pilot shortage. This is completely true. As with the above, how would fewer pilots on the same number of routes relieve the number of hours for which they are on duty? It won’t. The whole purpose of this bill is to increase safety. What is safe about an overworked pilot given even more hours in the driver’s seat? Absolutely nothing.

      • Rusty,

        I understand your frustration. If I was in your shoes I would feel it too. Not too long ago new pilots were not even competitive to fly Beech 99s and Metroliners without at least 2500TT. You flight instructed, traffic watch, banner towed, crop dusted, flew skydivers, etc. Those avenues are still there. It will delay your entry into the regionals, but it will be a much better place to be. People that slog it out for the love of aviation will stay and be prosperous. The ones with nice bank accounts will stay away because they can’t buy themselves a jet job anymore. Too much commitment will be required. This is a good thing for the profession. The medical profession has interns (flight instructing), residents (regionals, even though they have some doctors there) and full doctors (majors). There are barriers to entry to allow the best to operate and to keep pay to attract people into the system. We have to stop the cheapening of the profession to continue. It is not good for safety (best and brightest).
        The regionals can pay more, but they are constantly trying to find the bottom on cost in order to gain/retain flying. They are always profitable due to their contracts. The majors eat the losses, hence the problem.
        In regards to overworking pilots, there are plenty of people that are qualified to fly that have been furloughed from United, USair, American, Midwest, Continental, and Alaska. The money has to be there though. If you create this barrier to entry, it will shrink the pool of people looking just to fly a jet. The true pilots will remain and demand to be compensated properly. The regional cost advantage will shrink as well as their roll in the system which will create (or save) more Major airline jobs. Your stay in the regionals will be much shorter and your career in the majors will be about the same or better.

        The system will go back to the way it was before the regional explosion of the last 10 years. The race to the bottom hopefully has reached the bottom.

        Good luck in your career. I think it will be a better one because of this.

  4. What is the reason for excluding military records regarding poor performance? A poorly performing military pilot needs to be identified the same as a civilian pilot.
    Regarding the panels from NASA and NTSB to study fatigue and scheduling practices, these studies have already been perfomed. The debate is the airlines’ disagreance with the results of these studies such as scheduling a.m. to p.m. trip pairings, red eyes, performance degredation over eight hours of duty and time zone traversing. We in the aviation industry are all very well aware of these potentially hazardous fatigue related areas of interest and have strived to correct the FAR deficiencies through collective bargaining agreements, most of which are already much more restrictive than the FAR’s. Save time and have the panels take a cross section of the CBA’s (contracts) out there today. W. Foote, current 121 pilot

  5. I think this is a great idea. From reading the comments on this bill, it will take a few years to graduate from a college aviation program to being qualified to fly for an airline.

    A few years compared to a 30 year career?

    As a traveling art designer, I want to fly with someone who flew for a few years in props before getting hired at an airline. My firm won’t hire anyone without at least 5 years experience, regardless of what school they went to.

    Why should aviation be any different?

  6. So I don’t understand the new rest rules, anyone find them here?

    Next, anyone ever wonder why, as an American citizen, I cannot fly for a Major in Europe, or Australia, or Mexico or Canada, but a European citizen could fly for a major in the USA?

    Yes, I know in countries such as China, India, and the Middle east where they don’t have enough pilots they will approach American to fly their airliners.

    Does this new bill provide for European pilots flying for european carriers, who have fifth freedom rights to fly here in the USA Such as Virgin America, or Jet Blue? Come on folks, who finances Jet Blue (Lufthansa/Airbus), or Virgin America daaa Virgin Atlantic/Airbus. The managements at both Virgin America and Jet Blue are salavating at the ability of congress to let them get their feet in the USA door, hire foreign pilots and flood the market with flights. So much for new hire’s from America when these managements favor hiring foreign nationals.

    For those of you who do not understand the term “Fifth Freedom” let me explain. Their are five “Freedoms” in International air commerce. Lets say your United Airlines. And you fly between Sydney Aus, and Auckland NZ. Because you are not a flag carrier of either New Zealand or Australia, you technically require the permission of both nations in order to fly that leg. If you are granted permission such as this then you have earned the coveted Fifth Freedom, the ability to fly between two different countries neither of which are your own.

    I contend that both Jet Blue and Virgin America were set up by foreign interest in order to support their mother countries aviation industries and circumvent some laws such as the fifth freedom rules.

  7. Great idea. Good luck FAA – they already have a lot on their plate… This bill will not reduce the number of currently poorly-qualified rj F/Os as the bill established three years as a time line for all current Part 121 flight crew members to obtain an ATP.

    Pilot shortage? Not going to happen. Airlines are shrinking, there are thousands of major-carrier pilots out on furlough, and in a few years the normal stream of retired military pilots will pick up.

    So the question really is: if a young pilot wants a job at a 121 carrier, does banner towing, night freight, and “flight instruction” (and I use that term quite loosely…) as time-builders (in order to get the 1500 hours required to get a job at ASA/Comair, etc) result in a safer new-hire pilot?

    • The awnser to your question Astrachan is no. Statistics amoungst pilots have proven that expierance does not account for safety. It is upto the individual on how safe of a pilot there are. While it is true that alot of accidents happen amoungst pilots with 100-1000 hours of flight time it is also true that percentage wise pilots with 4000+ hours have just as many accidents. While safety is the number one concern in the airline idustry, it is up to the individual not the company or some flight school to determine how safe they are or the flight is. It is also true that flying is a rich mans hobby, if the requirment was raised to 1500 hours, it would be very difficult for new student pilots to meet such a demand. I attend ERAU in Prescott AZ and pay around $250 per hour for flight time.

  8. Can’t wait for 121 carriers to mess with (read that increase) duty/flight time limits based on some pseudoscience report called for in this bill. Can’t wait for legitimate fatigue issues to be nullified because some number says you can’t possibly be fatigued. Can’t wait until somebody decides that we can all fly 121 until we’re 70. Can’t wait to see what they come up with for the commuting pilot part of the duty equation. Just can’t wait…

  9. Deja vu.

    For decades, 1500 hrs was the magic number for minimum flight time to get any kind of airline job. Newly rated commercial pilots traditionally spent 1-3 years as flight instructors amassing those 1500 hrs. For years, flight schools paid instructors $5 an hour, knowing they had a captive market, since it was impractical to quickly gain flight time almost any other way save for banner towing or pipeline patrol. “Time builders” were easily exploited by the industry.

    Later, with the great expansion of airlines, particularly regional airlines, supply and demand greatly reduced the experience at which a pilot could be hired by a regional to fly sophisticated jets right off the bat, instead of working his/her way up through recips, turbo props, and finally jets.

    One factor was pay. Unable or unwilling to pay a decent wage, regionals hired whoever they could get. More experienced pilots were generally older, many had families and mortgages, and couldn’t afford to start at $16,000-$21,000 a year to fly for a regional, whereas younger (or newer career changer) pilots were more likely motivated to accept those terms.

    Cadets in the US military, or at many foreign airlines, are highly screened before training, and are quite successful in their flying careers. There has been and still is little but rudimentary screening at many regionals.

    Before the recent financial bust, many regionals were having difficulty recruiting pilots. Many were shocked that sometimes only a small percentage (sometimes zero!) pilots scheduled for initial training showed up. I know of one that scheduled a class every Monday, for some time, hoping somebody would walk through the door.

    The traditional training protocol for airlines for many years had been five simulator sessions, a check/type rating ride, then 25 hours of “initial operating experience”(IOE) on the line as an F/O,with some hours waivable for a number of landings.

    That protocol was changed. Around two years ago, I talked with an airline check airman who confirmed in answer to a question that some airlines were giving some pilots 20 simulator sessions, and up to 80 hours IOE. He said some check airman were balking, expressing doubts about training. I asked how a training department could possibly budget for such differing numbers, but he couldn’t answer.There were stories about a pilot who got his multi-engine rating during his regional jet initial check ride. And how could an instructor decide who got 15 sim sessions, as opposed to 17, 19, or 20? Same thing with IOE. Too many subjective judgments.

    Later in their careers, when their seniority numbers came up for upgrade to captain, company minimums prohibited those pilots from moving to the left seat, forcing some airlines (like Colgan) to bypass the traditional seniority system and hire experienced captains off the street.

    Despite all this, the airlines had record setting safety performance for some two years, so something was working right. Or, they were simply lucky, or both.

    If one examines the Colgan accident report carefully, it was not low total time which seems to have been responsible. For instance, many airlines train only for approach to stalls, not full stall recovery or through stick pusher activation. Training on tail stall in icing can be readily seen as a source of confusion for some pilots.

    Just a few years ago, even the major flight schools were worried about retaining instructors, since airlines were dispensing with the 1500 magic number, and hiring very low time pilots with virtually “wet” licenses, so airline minded instructors (the vast majority) had no incentive to stay in low-paid jobs training ab initio students, especially in crowded, hot, outmoded “steam gauge” trainers like Cessna 152s. Some advertising actually asked, “Why train as a CFI (flight instructor) when you can go right to an airline jet right seat with our training program?” Why, indeed?

    Despite the complexity of modern glass cockpits such as in the CRJ, training has become much more professional, particularly since the advent of simulators, non-existent in the days of the Beech 99, Twin Otter, etc.

    Similar concerns years ago resulted in calls for a national airline training academy, like West Point or Annapolis,,where pilots would be screened and trained like military pilots are today. That soon was discarded, for many reasons.

    As far as fatigue, the age old battle between operators, pilots and regulatory agencies continues.

    Often overlooked is the financial situation new pilots are forced to endure. The “crash van” parking lot at LA, utilized even by well paid senior pilots, the ban on sleeping in the crew lounge at Newark, the impossibility of living in the major crew base cities on new-hire pay, the requirement to change bases for upgrade, bump-back, or company needs all play a role in forcing pilots to commute, either from places where they can afford to live, or to keep their homes, families, and kids in schools without serious disruption.

    It’s obvious this plays a major role in pilot fatigue.

    We’ve all known pilots who commute from the other coast, or even from Europe! Few have the money or time to come in a day early and pay for prohibitively expensive hotels in cities like Boston, LA,or NYC. “Crash pads” often don’t allow a restful night’s sleep before a trip.

    If the FAA requires pilots to live where they work, a whole other set of problems arises.

    Perhaps airlines might combine to build “company housing” at major bases, renting part of a building out to full market rate tenants. Probably not practical. We have enough “frat house” type arrangements already.

    Good luck trying to work this all out. It ain’t easy!

  10. With all that is being said and rumored concerning the potential changes to our industry, I can’t help but become ever more concerned about the level of interest the no-nothings in congress have in “fixing those regionals”.
    Certain there are things that need to be changed. Pay and Rest requirements are the two items I would like to see improved. An airline’s ability to schedule a reduced-rest overnight of 8.5 hours is ridiculous. Expecting a new hire to live on 15-20k the first year only to make a whopping 25-30k the second is almost criminal. Even in the more affordable bases such as DFW and IAH that is simply not enough money to live.
    This is supposed to be an industry that attracts intelligent professionals, but the regionals have become experts in exploiting the wide-eyed over-eagerness of new pilots in their pursuit of “dude, I’m getting paid to fly”. As a committed capitalist I understand that it is in a companies best interest to pay its people what the market demands… unfortunately, pilots, especially the newer, younger breed, haven’t demanded much.
    In an empty promise to make things better unions have been voted in yet have done little more than erect walls between the management and labor side of airlines while earning little to nothing for their foolish members. Pay continues to be abysmal, schedules get worse, benefits are eroded, rest requirements haven’t been fixed in decades. Good job unions… you suck!
    Back to the professional theme… no matter what all interested parties do (or fail to do), the one thing that cannot be mandated or controlled is the level of professionalism of the Pilots. In the case of Colgan (and Comair, and the string of other non-regional crashes from the past) the one thing most of these tragedies have in common is the glaring lack of professionalism exhibited by those charged with the safe carriage of those paying customers.
    Commuting was not the issue… taking the red-eye from Washington New York, barely rest and then fly all day… stupid and unprofessional. Sleeping in the crew lounge (as most of us in the regionals can attest… a rat hole at best) before starting a trip… stupid and unprofessional.
    We’ve all been pared up with guys that try to fly sick, emotionally unfit (going through a divorce and talking to their attorney all friggen trip!!!), or otherwise not ready to be the responsible and professional pilot the passengers expect and pay for.
    All to often I am embarrassed by the loud, negative, and unproductive rhetoric being spewed from one pilot to another in the passenger terminal complaining about this and that and how terrible their lives are just in time for the people they are about to fly arrive at the gate to board. Good job.
    Before this turns into a rant I guess I’d better lay out the point I had intended to make:
    All parties will act in their own self-interest. Congress will load up the B.S., and Bureaucracy, in an effort to appear less useless. Airlines will push and lobby to keep the feds out of their efforts to penny pinch.
    Pilots… If we have any hope of saving and improving the career many of us still love then it is incumbent upon us to also act in our own self interest. It is time that we again become professionals. We need to work with our companies and unions (if unfortunate enough to have voted these leaches in) to push for better overall work rules and improved pay. We must take a more active and productive role in helping shape our companies and industry. Stop showing up to work the whiney slob. Stop encouraging new pilots to settle for the first 121 or 135 that insists on paying pathetic wages. And, if you really hate it so much… get out! There are plenty of people that wish they had more to their career than 4 grey-blue fabric walls and a worthless boss they have to suck up to everyday. If you so desire to be one of those guys, by all means… don’t let the door whack you in the back of the head on the way out.
    I am at heart an optimist. Though, you my beg to differ that point given my raving. I have serious misgivings about congress and the airlines, but I believe that present and future economic conditions will improve the validity of the pilots voice in this industry and that our hand will be improved sufficient enough to make this career the one we Professional Pilots hoped for when we first grabbed the controls of some crappy little airplane and thought… “hey, I could make money doing this”.

    • RB,

      Y0u sure are an optimist. Unhappy with the union “leeches”, the “whiners” and everyone else who is disenchanted, where, pray tell, is the basis for your optimism?

      Do you in your wildest dreams think things will somehow get better as the economy improves? Do you think your regional will improve your pay and conditions out of the goodness of their hearts? Or if they will even survive?

      I hope you last long enough to enjoy the career you profess to love.

      As one election slogan said,”If you’re not pissed off, you’re not paying attention!”

  11. I think this bill is a terrible idea, low hour pilots may seem like they have no experience, but they are coming fresh out of school and will not get complacent like some of the high hour pilots in the industry today.

  12. as i read through all the comments, it drives me nuts that so few people actually know the real airline industry. this is a horrible bill and the slow death of the airlines. i come from a military/airline family and it sickens both myself and my dad(a 30yr pilot and checkairman for a major carrier) that so many people think that low time pilots are a risk. true, some don’t belong in the cockpit but i know a lot of high time captains that don’t belong either. i am a low time pilot that received training from a major flight school, went through crm, etc. i currently work as a supervisor for a regional on the ramp. i think it’s a joke that the idiots running this country think this will solve everything. got news for them, it’s way worse than they think. there are current and furloughed pilots leaving the industry all together to go fly a desk at some 9-5 job cause they will make a lot more than they are now. the pilot shortage is coming sooner that they think and then what is the government going to do? the funny thing about military right now is that more and more pilots are being forced to fly drones. although this might be cool, the “flight time” that person builds for flying a uav around doesn’t count when you go to apply for an airline. as someone who has been around the ramp, that can be the worst safety issue. regionals as we all know pay close to minimum wage for any position. the morons they hire for this job is insane. i’ve seen rampers who could care less about bag/freight totals/weight and give guesstimates to the crews. how the heck is this safe! when i catch them, they’re done but you can’t be at every flight. i’ve also seen mx defer crazy stuff on planes that i wouldnt even fly with those issues. dispatch is one of the worst. too many times i’ve had pilots so mad that they have to fly a flight into a place they know they can’t land due to wx but are forced to atleast “try” or they can find a new job. that causes very low moral and the passengers see that when the flight returns to its origin of departure. if the government is worried about safety, maybe they should start with the ground crews and operations first instead of blaming pilots. even though i’m very upset about this bill, it’s not going to keep me from eventually flying for an airline. anyone thinking that the problem will be resolved by bringing back furloughed pilots are clueless. that number is very small since a lot of them have found a different career because they didn’t want to sit on their butts for 2-5 yrs waiting for that 20,000 dollar job to open up again. yes, pilots, no matter if they fly for a regional should be paid a lot more than they are. this should also be true for the below wing part of a regional as well. if you are truly passionate about aviation, maybe you should learn about the entire aspect of the airline industry and what a hazard the overall operation is instead of blaming low time pilots. if a young pilot can go into an interview and pass all the requirements like an older, high time pilot, why can’t they get the job if they have the same or better knowledge. i know many 20-30 yr captains for major airlines that have said they’d rather have a low time f/o with real airline experience than a high time person that built time going for $100 hamburgers and flying the same cross countries to build time.


Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.