Russian President Approves Ratification of Russian-Chinese Agreement on Notification of Missile and Rocket Launches
November 8, 2010 at 9:03 am | Posted in Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby Sara M. Langston with the blog faculty
Source: Roscosmos
The Federal Law ratifies the agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on notification of launches of ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles, signed in Beijing on October 13, 2009.
The agreement’s purpose is to establish a reciprocal notification mechanism for planned and executed launches of ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles in Russia and China in order to avoid any unclear and unforeseen situations.
Information on launches of ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles will be exchanged on a confidential basis.
Notification will be given for launches of ballistic missiles of a range of more than 2,000 km in the direction of either of the signatories.
The agreement sets the deadlines and validity periods for notification, and also the list of data to be provided.
The Federal Law ratifies the agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on notification of launches of ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles, signed in Beijing on October 13, 2009.The agreement’s purpose is to establish a reciprocal notification mechanism for planned and executed launches of ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles in Russia and China in order to avoid any unclear and unforeseen situations.
Information on launches of ballistic missiles and space launch vehicles will be exchanged on a confidential basis.
Notification will be given for launches of ballistic missiles of a range of more than 2,000 km in the direction of either of the signatories.
The agreement sets the deadlines and validity periods for notification, and also the list of data to be provided.
Space data to revolutionise environmental management in Wales
November 8, 2010 at 8:55 am | Posted in Aerospace Law Interfaces | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
Source – UK Space Agency:
Space data to revolutionise environmental management in Wales
This week the Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) announced a new project which will use Earth Observation data to classify all of Wales’ wildlife habitats, from grassland and woodland to coastal heath, upland bogs and moors. In the past this painstaking exercise has been carried out by teams of biologists on foot but the use of satellites will revolutionise this process, delivering improved information at a fraction of the time and cost of using old methods.
The UK Space Agency together with CCW supported early, underpinning research work. The successful conclusion of this work has meant that CCW can now operationally and routinely use satellite data to monitor their environment. This pioneering approach has attracted much attention and is being considered for implementation at European-wide level.
Commercial Space Travel Rules of the Road
November 8, 2010 at 8:51 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
Source – Discovery News:
Commercial Space Travel Rules of the Road
Irene Klotz
By Irene Klotz
Fri Nov 5, 2010 07:00 AM ETFast-forward 10 years and in addition to flying cars and unmanned aircraft, there are suborbital rocket rides launching from New Mexico, astronauts getting ready for a taxi ride to the space station, and people living in privately owned outposts in orbit.
That’s the future showing up on FAA radars as the agency prepares for commercial space travel.
The agency is working on its first license for a spacecraft to re-enter Earth’s atmosphere. Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, wants to test-fly its Dragon capsule later this month. . . .[Full Story]
IAA: 2nd Symposium on Private Human Access to Space
November 8, 2010 at 8:43 am | Posted in Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The IAA has issued it’s initial call for papers for its 2nd Symposium on Private Human Access to Space to be held in Arcachon, France May 30- June 1, 2011. One of the topics being covered is:
The Symposium will address Legal, Regulatory and Insurance aspects, on both certification and safety features of commercial human space flight: current limitations will be identified and future actions will be proposed,
Arianspace has won a tender for carrier rocket for Azerbaijan’s first national satellite
November 5, 2010 at 9:47 am | Posted in Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby Sara M. Langston with the blog faculty
Source: ABC.AZ News
Baku, Fineko/abc.az. The Ministry of Communications and Information Technology has published the results of the tender procedure for the carrier rocket manufacturer within launching the first national satellite of Azerbaijan. The MCIT reports that official signing of a contract with tender winner French company will be held tomorrow.
The tender involved four companies: ILS (Russia), Arianspace (France), SpaceX (USA) and Ukroboronservis (Russia-Ukraine).
Parallel negotiations are being conducted with Korea, Greece, Italy and Russia, the signing of the primary protocols with them for coordination of satellite networks is scheduled for early 2011.
U.S. Executive Order on Controlled Unclassified Information
November 5, 2010 at 8:27 am | Posted in Aerospace Law Interfaces | Leave a commentby Sara M. Langston with the blog faculty
Source: The White House
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
Executive Order — Controlled Unclassified Information
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. This order establishes an open and uniform program for managing information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls pursuant to and consistent with law, regulations, and Government-wide policies, excluding information that is classified under Executive Order 13526 of December 29, 2009, or the Atomic Energy Act, as amended.
At present, executive departments and agencies (agencies) employ ad hoc, agency-specific policies, procedures, and markings to safeguard and control this information, such as information that involves privacy, security, proprietary business interests, and law enforcement investigations. This inefficient, confusing patchwork has resulted in inconsistent marking and safeguarding of documents, led to unclear or unnecessarily restrictive dissemination policies, and created impediments to authorized information sharing. The fact that these agency-specific policies are often hidden from public view has only aggravated these issues.
To address these problems, this order establishes a program for managing this information, hereinafter described as Controlled Unclassified Information, that emphasizes the openness and uniformity of Government-wide practice.
Sec. 2. Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
(a) The CUI categories and subcategories shall serve as exclusive designations for identifying unclassified information throughout the executive branch that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls, pursuant to and consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Government-wide policies.
(b) The mere fact that information is designated as CUI shall not have a bearing on determinations pursuant to any law requiring the disclosure of information or permitting disclosure as a matter of discretion, including disclosures to the legislative or judicial branches.
(c) The National Archives and Records Administration shall serve as the Executive Agent to implement this order and oversee agency actions to ensure compliance with this order.
Sec. 3. Review of Current Designations.
(a) Each agency head shall, within 180 days of the date
of this order:
(1) review all categories, subcategories, and markings used by the agency to designate unclassified information for safeguarding or dissemination controls; and
(2) submit to the Executive Agent a catalogue of
proposed categories and subcategories of CUI, and proposed associated markings for information designated as CUI under section 2(a) of this order. This submission shall provide definitions for each proposed category and subcategory and identify the basis in law, regulation, or Government-wide policy for safeguarding or dissemination controls.
(b) If there is significant doubt about whether
information should be designated as CUI, it shall not be so designated.
Sec. 4. Development of CUI Categories and Policies.
(a) On the basis of the submissions under section 3 of this order or future proposals, and in consultation with affected agencies, the Executive Agent shall, in a timely manner, approve categories and subcategories of CUI and associated markings to be applied uniformly throughout the executive branch and to become effective upon publication in the registry established under subsection (d) of this section. No unclassified information meeting the requirements of section 2(a) of this order shall be disapproved for inclusion as CUI, but the Executive Agent may resolve conflicts among categories and subcategories of CUI to achieve uniformity and may determine the markings to be used.
(b) The Executive Agent, in consultation with affected agencies, shall develop and issue such directives as are necessary to implement this order. Such directives shall be made available to the public and shall provide policies and procedures concerning marking, safeguarding, dissemination, and decontrol of CUI that, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, regulation, and Government-wide policies, shall remain consistent across categories and subcategories of CUI and throughout the executive branch. In developing such directives, appropriate consideration should be given to the report of the interagency Task Force on Controlled Unclassified Information published in August 2009. The Executive Agent shall issue initial directives for the implementation of this order within 180 days of the date of this order.
(c) The Executive Agent shall convene and chair interagency meetings to discuss matters pertaining to the program established by this order.
(d) Within 1 year of the date of this order, the Executive Agent shall establish and maintain a public CUI registry reflecting authorized CUI categories and subcategories, associated markings, and applicable safeguarding, dissemination, and decontrol procedures.
(e) If the Executive Agent and an agency cannot reach agreement on an issue related to the implementation of this order, that issue may be appealed to the President through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
(f) In performing its functions under this order, the Executive Agent, in accordance with applicable law, shall consult with representatives of the public and State, local, tribal, and private sector partners on matters related to approving categories and subcategories of CUI and developing implementing directives issued by the Executive Agent pursuant to this order.
Sec. 5. Implementation.
(a) Within 180 days of the issuance of initial policies and procedures by the Executive Agent in accordance with section 4(b) of this order, each agency that originates or handles CUI shall provide the Executive Agent with a proposed plan for compliance with the requirements of this order, including the establishment of interim target dates.
(b) After a review of agency plans, and in consultation with affected agencies and the Office of Management and Budget, the Executive Agent shall establish deadlines for phased implementation by agencies.
(c) In each of the first 5 years following the date of this order and biennially thereafter, the Executive Agent shall publish a report on the status of agency implementation of this order.
Sec. 6. General Provisions.
(a) This order shall be implemented in a manner consistent with:
(1) applicable law, including protections of confidentiality and privacy rights;
(2) the statutory authority of the heads of agencies, including authorities related to the protection of information provided by the private sector to the Federal Government; and
(3) applicable Government-wide standards and guidelines issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and applicable policies established by the Office of Management and Budget.
(b) The Director of National Intelligence (Director), with respect to the Intelligence Community and after consultation with the heads of affected agencies, may issue such policy directives and guidelines as the Director deems necessary to implement this order with respect to intelligence and intelligence-related information. Procedures or other guidance issued by Intelligence Community element heads shall be in accordance with such policy directives or guidelines issued by the Director. Any such policy directives or guidelines issued by the Director shall be in accordance with this order and directives issued by the Executive Agent.
(c) This order shall not be construed to impair or otherwise affect the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, and legislative proposals.
(d) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(e) This order shall be implemented subject to the availability of appropriations.
(f) The Attorney General, upon request by the head of an agency or the Executive Agent, shall render an interpretation of this order with respect to any question arising in the course of its administration.
(g) The Presidential Memorandum of May 7, 2008, entitled “Designation and Sharing of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)” is hereby rescinded.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
November 4, 2010.
Russian – Chinese Space Cooperation Subcommittee Finalized in Beijing
November 4, 2010 at 3:45 pm | Posted in Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby Sara M. Langston with the blog faculty
Source: Roscosmos
The 11-th meeting of the Russian–Chinese Space Cooperation Subcommittee finalized in Beijing today, on Nov. 2.
The meeting is attended by the delegation of Federal Space Agency led by Roscosmos Head Anatoly Perminov. The Subcommittee deals with preparation of the Heads of the Governments.
Roscosmos Head Anatoly Perminov, who chairs the Subcommittee on the Russian side, appreciated Administrator of Chinese Space Administration Chen Qiufa and Chinese colleagues on organization of the Meeting on behalf of the Federal Space Agency.
Roscosmos Head noted that Russian-Chinese Space Program of 2010–2012 approved in Oct. 2009 during the 14th meeting of the Russian and Chinese Governments laid reliable grounds for further development and intensification of cooperation for the upcoming years, as it implies mutually beneficial collaboration aimed at improving space science and products. According to Perminov, both parties are to put efforts into accomplishing the goals of the Program.
There is a major joint objective of Mars and Phobos exploration – Russian spacecraft Phobos-Grunt and Chinese microsatellite Inkho-1 are to be launched in 2011.
Roscosmos Head also pays special attention to organization of the cooperation in future space programs, which is to be based upon rational application of Russian and Chinese scientific and production capabilities, on the principles of friendship and collaboration. Only united efforts of the states involved in space programs can help accomplishing the predefined mutually beneficial goals.
Perminov expressed his satisfaction in the results achieved at the 11-th meeting of the Russian–Chinese Space Cooperation Subcommittee.
Technology Opens Military Space
November 4, 2010 at 7:35 am | Posted in Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby Sara M. Langston with the blog faculty
Source: Aviation Week
As space becomes more important to military operations, the flimsiness of the laws and conventions that govern space operations is more apparent. It’s not so much that the structure has become weaker as that technological and industrial developments have exposed its failings.
Recent years have seen a satellite shoot-down demonstration by China in January 2007, followed a year later by the U.S. shoot-down of the malfunctioning USA 193 spacecraft. There have also been reported incidents of deliberate non-kinetic interference with U.S. spacecraft.
Analyst Dean Cheng of the Heritage Foundation, speaking at a symposium on deterrence in Omaha, Neb., noted that Chinese doctrine makes no distinction between deterrence and compellance (making an adversary take an action, rather than refraining), and that deterrence extends across all domains, including conventional, cyber and space. Cheng said China’s policy of compellance and deterrence stresses the importance of demonstrating the will to act, as the 2007 test did.
China, added Cheng, sees the U.S. Schriever X space wargame—conducted at Nellis AFB, Nev., in May—as a demonstration of intent, and although China has proposed to stop the “weaponization” of space, these proposals encompass only weapons on-orbit, not ground-launched systems or orbital sensors…more
Disasters Charter: Volcano in Indonesia
November 3, 2010 at 9:24 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The Disasters Charter has been activated for a Volcano in Indonesia:
Volcano in Indonesia
Type of Event: Volcano
Location of Event: Indonesia
Date of Charter Activation: 03/11/2010
Charter Requestor: Indonesian Center for Volcanic and Geologic Hazard Mitigation.
Project Management: VDAP (Volcano Disaster Assistance Program)Description of the Event:
On 25 October 2010, the Indonesian government raised the alert for Mount Merapi to its highest level and warned villagers in threatened areas to move to safer ground. People living within 10km (6 mile) zone were told to evacuate.Officials said about 500 volcanic earthquakes had been recorded on the mountain over the weekend of 23-24 October, and that the magma had risen to about a kilometre below the surface due to the seismic activity.
On the afternoon of 25 October 2010 Mount Merapi erupted lava from its southern and south-eastern slopes
France, Germany Battle over Directorship of European Space Policy
November 3, 2010 at 9:11 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
Source – Space News:
France, Germany Battle over Directorship of European Space Policy
By Peter B. de SeldingBRUSSELS, Belgium — The opposing views of France and Germany over whether the 27-nation European Union or the 18-nation European Space Agency (ESA) should direct Europe’s space policy were presented in stark form here Oct. 26.
In successive presentations made here during a conference at the European Parliament on “A New Space Policy for Europe,” organized by Business Bridge Europe, the heads of the French and German space agencies outlined policy objectives that could not have been more different. . . . [Full Story]
Get a blog at WordPress.com | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

