Event: NASA’s New Vision

April 19, 2010 at 2:57 pm | Posted in Space Law Current Events | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

From CSIS:

NASA’s New Vision
With Lori B. Garver, NASA Deputy Administrator

*
Date: Monday, Apr 26, 2010 | 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm
Location:

B-1 Conference Center
Center for Strategic and International Studies
1800 K Street, NW
Washington DC, 20006
[View Map]

NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver will share her insights on the new path being charted for NASA, particularly as they regard human space flight. She will discuss the administration’s new emphasis on developmental and cutting-edge technology for human and robotic exploration, its plans to fully leverage the potential of the International Space Station, and its renewed focus on earth and space science.

Please RSVP by email to space@csis.org.
Programs
Space Initiatives
Topics
Space, Technology

South Africa, Brazil, India Space Cooperation

April 19, 2010 at 2:24 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

From the EARSC:

SA, Brazil and India agree to joint satellite programme at trilateral summit

At the conclusion of the fourth India Brazil South Africa Dialogue Forum (Ibsa) summit in Brasília on Thursday, the leaders of the three countries – South African President Jacob Zuma, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva – announced that they had agreed to set up a trilateral satellite programme.

The programme will involve two satellites, one for Earth observation and the other for space weather and climate studies. As yet, no budget for the programme has been released.

The space weather satellite will be the first to be built and is planned to be ready for launch two years from now.

It looks as if South Africa will provide the satellite bus for this spacecraft. The bus is the term given to the basic spacecraft – that is, the structure and the control, navigation, communications and power systems – on which the actual observation imagers and systems, experiments, transponders, etc. (depending on the type of satellite) are mounted. But most of the instruments to be mounted on the bus will be provided by Brazil.

The Earth observation satellite should follow two years after the space weather satellite – in other words, four years from now – and is likely – although this is not yet confirmed – to carry South Africa’s MSMI imager, developed by Stellenbosch-based Sun Space & Information Systems (SunSpace) in cooperation with the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium.

Both satellites will be launched by India, the only one of the Ibsa countries to have the capability to launch satellites at the moment.

Speaking on behalf of the three leaders, President Lula da Silva remarked that “they [the satellites] will benefit the Ibsa countries and other friendly countries, providing more effect in matters of agriculture, transport and telecommunications. It is a project symbolic of the new stage in our partnership.”

European Aviation Regulatory Agenda

April 16, 2010 at 2:55 pm | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

From Aviation Week:

Regulatory Agenda Worries European Airlines

Apr 16, 2010

By Robert Wall
Edinburgh, Scotland

A raft of regulatory and legislative initiatives pending in Brussels is raising anxiety among airlines that their ability to effectively compete will suffer long-term damage.

The airline industry’s relationship with European Union representatives has often been tense, but there is growing concern that as a new European Parliament and Commission look to make their mark in the coming months, airlines may be a target, or at least a victim, of the process.

There is “a high risk we will be seeing new regulation that is neither urgent nor important,” warns Simon McNamara, director of industry affairs for the European Regional Airlines Association (ERA). Possible affected areas could include slot allocations along with lost baggage and bankruptcy protection policies. . . . [Full Story]

Resources on the President’s Space Exploration Strategy

April 16, 2010 at 1:33 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

A round up of news and commentary on President Obama’s speech on space exploration yesterday:

Press Gaggle by Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton en route Cape Canaveral, Florida Aboard Air Force One – The White House

Obama Speech Redefines NASA Plans, Space Experts Say – Space.com

Commercial Spaceflight Federation Hails President’s Space Plan As Creating “More Spacecraft, More Astronaut Flights, and More Jobs” – Commercial Spaceflight Federation

Obama Lays Out Space Exploration Plans At KSC – Aviation Week

Obama Promises Continued Leadership in Space – Space Policy Online

21st Century Space Exploration: “The Next Chapter That We Can Write Together Here at NASA” – The White House Blog

President Obama’s Space Exploration Speech (15 April 2010) and Human Asteroid Mission Mention – Planetary Defense

President Obama’s space policy address – RLV and Space Transport News

Video: Remarks of President Obama at KSC -NASA Watch

The speech and some “instant analysis” – Space Politics

Obama aims to send astronauts to Mars orbit in 2030s – Space Daily

Obama Addresses NASA – The Space Advocate

Obama sets new course to conquer the final frontier – Space Daily

Thoughts on Obama’s NASA speech – Open NASA

Moon vets say Obama’s NASA cuts would ground U.S. – USA Today

Congressional Reaction To Today’s Speech – NASA Watch

Commercial Sector Reaction – NASA Watch

Obama Reaffirms Commitment to Deep Space Exploration – Red Orbit News

Some Pictures from President Obama’s Florida Space Conference – Planetary Society Blog

Old vs. new space policies – Cosmic Log

Statement from Elon Musk – The Space Fellowship

More response to the President’s plans for NASA – RLV and Space Transport News

VIDEO: Obama Kennedy Space Center visit media coverage – Hyperbola

2,400 Jobs for Florida’s Space Coast – Really Rocket Science

AIAA PRESIDENT DAVID THOMPSON PRAISES PRESIDENT OBAMA’S VISION AND SUPPORT FOR FUTURE SPACE ENDEAVORS – AIAA

Congressional roundup: the song (mostly) remains the same – Space Politics

Satellite data improve aviation safety

April 16, 2010 at 1:14 pm | Posted in Aviation Law, Space Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

From ESA:

Satellite data improve aviation safety

16 April 2010
Thousands of planes are grounded across Europe due to the spread of volcanic ash following the recent eruption under Iceland’s Eyjafjallajoekull glacier. Volcanic eruptions eject large amounts of ash and trace gases such as sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere, often reaching the altitudes of scheduled flights.

When flying through a volcanic ash cloud, ash particles enter the jet engines which can result in engine failure. The ash can also severely damage the material of the aircraft, clog its sensors, limit the view of its pilots, and severely scratch, or ‘sandblast’, cockpit windows, landing light covers and parts of the tail and wings.

Over 90 aircraft have sustained damage after flying through volcanic ash clouds. The total cost of damage sustained by aircraft due to volcanic ash clouds from 1982-2000 is estimated at 250 million US dollars.

Every year there are about 60 volcanic eruptions. Ground-based monitoring is carried out on only a limited number of volcanoes. In fact, most volcanoes, especially those which are remotely located, are not monitored on a regular basis. Therefore, observations of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and aerosols derived from satellite measurements in near-real time can provide useful complementary information to assess, on a global level, possible impacts of volcanic eruptions on air traffic control and public safety.

Ensuring that volcanic cloud hazards are addressed, the Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres (VAACs) were established in 1995 to gather information regarding volcanic ash clouds and to assess the possible hazard to aviation. To assist the VAACS in their tasks, ESA started the Support to Aviation Control Service (SACS) service to deliver SO2 email alerts to them in near-real time. For each alert, a dedicated map around the location of the SO2 peak value that triggered the alert is produced and put on a dedicated web page, mentioned in the email.

In addition to VAACs, the information – derived from the SCIAMACHY instrument on ESA’s Envisat, GOME-2 and IASI on MetOp, OMI on EOS-Aura and AIRS on Aqua – is delivered to volcanological observatories, health care organisations, scientists, etc.

To know whether aircraft may safely pass under or over volcanic ash clouds and to forecast better the future motion of the clouds, the VAACs need more accurate information on the altitude and vertical size of an ash plume.

This is the main focus of ESA’s Support to Aviation for Volcanic Ash Avoidance (SAVAA) project which aims to set up a demonstration system able to ingest satellite data and meteorological wind fields, in order to compute the injection height profile of volcanic emissions, using trajectory and inverse modelling. The system can then be implemented into the operational environment of the VAACs.

Furthermore, the SAVAA project is providing complementary data to the SACS SO2 alerts by developing volcanic ash alert services for VAACs based on satellite data measured in the infrared part of the spectrum.

United Kingdom: Statutory Instrument 2010 No. 1226 – The Civil Aviation (Working Time) (Amendment) Regulations 2010

April 16, 2010 at 1:10 pm | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a comment

The United Kingdom’s Statutory Instrument 2010 No. 1226: The Civil Aviation (Working Time) (Amendment) Regulations 2010 (PDF) was made on 8 April 2010, laid before Parliament on 9th April 2010, and comes into force on 28 June 2010. According to the explanatory memorandum the purpose of the agreement is:

This instrument amends the Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004 (“the 2004 Regulations”) so as to harmonise them with the Civil Aviation Authority (“the CAA”) flight time limitation guidance document (known as “CAP 371”) in relation to the calculation of certain periods of standby duty for aircrew. This ensures that time spent on standby counts expressly as working time for the purposes of the 2004 Regulations, but also allows standby time o be calculated as less than full working time when certain specified criteria are met.

H.R. 5021: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that fees charged for baggage carried into the cabin of an aircraft are subject to the excise tax imposed on transportation of persons by air

April 16, 2010 at 11:19 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

H.R. 5021: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that fees charged for baggage carried into the cabin of an aircraft are subject to the excise tax imposed on transportation of persons by air was introduced on April 15, 2010 by Rep. Timothy Bishop (D-NY1):

HR 5021 IH

111th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 5021

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that fees charged for baggage carried into the cabin of an aircraft are subject to the excise tax imposed on transportation of persons by air.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 14, 2010

Mr. BISHOP of New York (for himself, Mr. MCMAHON, Mr. ELLSWORTH, Mr. NADLER of New York, and Mr. HARE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that fees charged for baggage carried into the cabin of an aircraft are subject to the excise tax imposed on transportation of persons by air.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Block Airlines’ Gratuitous Fees Act’ or the `BAG Fees Act’.

SEC. 2. FEES FOR CARRY-ON BAGGAGE TREATED AS PAID FOR TAXABLE TRANSPORTATION.

(a) In General- Subsection (e) of section 4261 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

`(5) AMOUNTS PAID FOR CARRY-ON BAGGAGE- Any amount paid for baggage personally carried into the cabin of the aircraft by a person shall be treated for purposes of subsection (a) as an amount paid for taxable transportation.’.

(b) Effective Date- The amendment may by this section shall apply to transportation beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

H. Res. 1269: Commemorating the 400th anniversary of the first use of the telescope for astronomical observation by the Italian scientist Galileo Galilei

April 16, 2010 at 10:39 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

H. Res. 1269: Commemorating the 400th anniversary of the first use of the telescope for astronomical observation by the Italian scientist Galileo Galilei was introduced on April 15, 2010 by Rep. Patrick Tiberi (R-OH12).

DoD Strategy To Propose International Rules for Space

April 15, 2010 at 3:54 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a comment

by Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz with the blog faculty

Source:  Defense News

BY JOHN REED

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. – The Pentagon’s new National Security Space Strategy will propose international rules of the road for orbital space, an increasingly crowded and contested domain, U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn said April 14.

“We can no longer take access for granted,” Lynn said during a speech at the National Space Symposium here. “Since the environment has changed, our approach must change as well.”

Slated for released this summer, the strategy will have three pillars, Lynn said:

å Norms of behavior, which include “shared rules of the road in space to provide predictability in the congested environment space has become.”

å Shared dependence of space systems. For example, many nations rely on the U.S. Global Positioning System, which reduces the threat since an attack on GPS would hurt many countries.

å Defenses for satellites, including “protective tactics” for satellites, building back-up capabilities for them and continuing to develop the Operationally Responsive Space (ORS) program that allows for the rapid design and launch of satellites.

“Replacement satellites and unmanned aircraft platforms and other solutions can temporarily mitigate the loss of space assets,” said Lynn. “In this context our [ORS] program can help us counter threats to our space capabilities.”

Lynn noted that the first ORS satellite is expected to be in space and serving troops in the Middle East within the year.

The Pentagon plans eventually to develop a new satellite system called Spacecraft Fracturation, which would “avoid the vulnerabilities of a single [satellite] by breaking up the space systems into many component parts” connected by wireless network, said Lynn.

This would also make it easier for smaller companies to enter the space market, Lynn said.

Remarks by the President on Space Exploration in the 21st Century

April 15, 2010 at 3:48 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a comment

by P.J. Blount with the blog faculty

From the White House:

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
April 15, 2010
Remarks by the President on Space Exploration in the 21st Century

John F. Kennedy Space Center
Merritt Island, Florida

2:55 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, everybody. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you so much. Thank you, everybody. Please have a seat. Thank you.

I want to thank Senator Bill Nelson and NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden for their extraordinary leadership. I want to recognize Dr. Buzz Aldrin as well, who’s in the house. (Applause.) Four decades ago, Buzz became a legend. But in the four decades since he’s also been one of America’s leading visionaries and authorities on human space flight.

Few people — present company excluded — can claim the expertise of Buzz and Bill and Charlie when it comes to space exploration. I have to say that few people are as singularly unimpressed by Air Force One as those three. (Laughter.) Sure, it’s comfortable, but it can’t even reach low Earth orbit. And that obviously is in striking contrast to the Falcon 9 rocket we just saw on the launch pad, which will be tested for the very first time in the coming weeks.

A couple of other acknowledgments I want to make. We’ve got Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee from Texas visiting us, a big supporter of the space program. (Applause.) My director, Office of Science and Technology Policy — in other words my chief science advisor — John Holdren is here. (Applause.) And most of all I want to acknowledge your congresswoman Suzanne Kosmas, because every time I meet with her, including the flight down here, she reminds me of how important our NASA programs are and how important this facility is. And she is fighting for every single one of you and for her district and for the jobs in her district. And you should know that you’ve got a great champion in Congresswoman Kosmas. Please give her a big round of applause. (Applause.)

I also want to thank everybody for participating in today’s conference. And gathered here are scientists, engineers, business leaders, public servants, and a few more astronauts as well. Last but not least, I want to thank the men and women of NASA for welcoming me to the Kennedy Space Center, and for your contributions not only to America, but to the world.

Here at the Kennedy Space Center we are surrounded by monuments and milestones of those contributions. It was from here that NASA launched the missions of Mercury and Gemini and Apollo. It was from here that Space Shuttle Discovery, piloted by Charlie Bolden, carried the Hubble Telescope into orbit, allowing us to plumb the deepest recesses of our galaxy. And I should point out, by the way, that in my private office just off the Oval, I’ve got the picture of Jupiter from the Hubble. So thank you, Charlie, for helping to decorate my office. (Laughter.) It was from here that men and women, propelled by sheer nerve and talent, set about pushing the boundaries of humanity’s reach.

That’s the story of NASA. And it’s a story that started a little more than half a century ago, far from the Space Coast, in a remote and desolate region of what is now called Kazakhstan. Because it was from there that the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the first artificial satellite to orbit the Earth, which was little more than a few pieces of metal with a transmitter and a battery strapped to the top of a missile. But the world was stunned. Americans were dumbfounded. The Soviets, it was perceived, had taken the lead in a race for which we were not yet fully prepared.

But we caught up very quick. President Eisenhower signed legislation to create NASA and to invest in science and math education, from grade school to graduate school. In 1961, President Kennedy boldly declared before a joint session of Congress that the United States would send a man to the Moon and return him safely to the Earth within the decade. And as a nation, we set about meeting that goal, reaping rewards that have in the decades since touched every facet of our lives. NASA was at the forefront. Many gave their careers to the effort. And some have given far more.

In the years that have followed, the space race inspired a generation of scientists and innovators, including, I’m sure, many of you. It’s contributed to immeasurable technological advances that have improved our health and well-being, from satellite navigation to water purification, from aerospace manufacturing to medical imaging. Although, I have to say, during a meeting right before I came out on stage somebody said, you know, it’s more than just Tang — and I had to point out I actually really like Tang. (Laughter.) I thought that was very cool.

And leading the world to space helped America achieve new heights of prosperity here on Earth, while demonstrating the power of a free and open society to harness the ingenuity of its people.

And on a personal note, I have been part of that generation so inspired by the space program. 1961 was the year of my birth — the year that Kennedy made his announcement. And one of my earliest memories is sitting on my grandfather’s shoulders, waving a flag as astronauts arrived in Hawaii. For me, the space program has always captured an essential part of what it means to be an American — reaching for new heights, stretching beyond what previously did not seem possible. And so, as President, I believe that space exploration is not a luxury, it’s not an afterthought in America’s quest for a brighter future — it is an essential part of that quest.

So today, I’d like to talk about the next chapter in this story. The challenges facing our space program are different, and our imperatives for this program are different, than in decades past. We’re no longer racing against an adversary. We’re no longer competing to achieve a singular goal like reaching the Moon. In fact, what was once a global competition has long since become a global collaboration. But while the measure of our achievements has changed a great deal over the past 50 years, what we do — or fail to do — in seeking new frontiers is no less consequential for our future in space and here on Earth.

So let me start by being extremely clear: I am 100 percent committed to the mission of NASA and its future. (Applause.) Because broadening our capabilities in space will continue to serve our society in ways that we can scarcely imagine. Because exploration will once more inspire wonder in a new generation — sparking passions and launching careers. And because, ultimately, if we fail to press forward in the pursuit of discovery, we are ceding our future and we are ceding that essential element of the American character.

I know there have been a number of questions raised about my administration’s plan for space exploration, especially in this part of Florida where so many rely on NASA as a source of income as well as a source of pride and community. And these questions come at a time of transition, as the space shuttle nears its scheduled retirement after almost 30 years of service. And understandably, this adds to the worries of folks concerned not only about their own futures but about the future of the space program to which they’ve devoted their lives.

But I also know that underlying these concerns is a deeper worry, one that precedes not only this plan but this administration. It stems from the sense that people in Washington — driven sometimes less by vision than by politics — have for years neglected NASA’s mission and undermined the work of the professionals who fulfill it. We’ve seen that in the NASA budget, which has risen and fallen with the political winds.

But we can also see it in other ways: in the reluctance of those who hold office to set clear, achievable objectives; to provide the resources to meet those objectives; and to justify not just these plans but the larger purpose of space exploration in the 21st century.

All that has to change. And with the strategy I’m outlining today, it will. We start by increasing NASA’s budget by $6 billion over the next five years, even — (applause) — I want people to understand the context of this. This is happening even as we have instituted a freeze on discretionary spending and sought to make cuts elsewhere in the budget.

So NASA, from the start, several months ago when I issued my budget, was one of the areas where we didn’t just maintain a freeze but we actually increased funding by $6 billion. By doing that we will ramp up robotic exploration of the solar system, including a probe of the Sun’s atmosphere; new scouting missions to Mars and other destinations; and an advanced telescope to follow Hubble, allowing us to peer deeper into the universe than ever before.

We will increase Earth-based observation to improve our understanding of our climate and our world — science that will garner tangible benefits, helping us to protect our environment for future generations.

And we will extend the life of the International Space Station likely by more than five years, while actually using it for its intended purpose: conducting advanced research that can help improve the daily lives of people here on Earth, as well as testing and improving upon our capabilities in space. This includes technologies like more efficient life support systems that will help reduce the cost of future missions. And in order to reach the space station, we will work with a growing array of private companies competing to make getting to space easier and more affordable. (Applause.)

Now, I recognize that some have said it is unfeasible or unwise to work with the private sector in this way. I disagree. The truth is, NASA has always relied on private industry to help design and build the vehicles that carry astronauts to space, from the Mercury capsule that carried John Glenn into orbit nearly 50 years ago, to the space shuttle Discovery currently orbiting overhead. By buying the services of space transportation — rather than the vehicles themselves — we can continue to ensure rigorous safety standards are met. But we will also accelerate the pace of innovations as companies — from young startups to established leaders — compete to design and build and launch new means of carrying people and materials out of our atmosphere.

In addition, as part of this effort, we will build on the good work already done on the Orion crew capsule. I’ve directed Charlie Bolden to immediately begin developing a rescue vehicle using this technology, so we are not forced to rely on foreign providers if it becomes necessary to quickly bring our people home from the International Space Station. And this Orion effort will be part of the technological foundation for advanced spacecraft to be used in future deep space missions. In fact, Orion will be readied for flight right here in this room. (Applause.)

Next, we will invest more than $3 billion to conduct research on an advanced “heavy lift rocket” — a vehicle to efficiently send into orbit the crew capsules, propulsion systems, and large quantities of supplies needed to reach deep space. In developing this new vehicle, we will not only look at revising or modifying older models; we want to look at new designs, new materials, new technologies that will transform not just where we can go but what we can do when we get there. And we will finalize a rocket design no later than 2015 and then begin to build it. (Applause.) And I want everybody to understand: That’s at least two years earlier than previously planned — and that’s conservative, given that the previous program was behind schedule and over budget.

At the same time, after decades of neglect, we will increase investment — right away — in other groundbreaking technologies that will allow astronauts to reach space sooner and more often, to travel farther and faster for less cost, and to live and work in space for longer periods of time more safely. That means tackling major scientific and technological challenges. How do we shield astronauts from radiation on longer missions? How do we harness resources on distant worlds? How do we supply spacecraft with energy needed for these far-reaching journeys? These are questions that we can answer and will answer. And these are the questions whose answers no doubt will reap untold benefits right here on Earth.

So the point is what we’re looking for is not just to continue on the same path — we want to leap into the future; we want major breakthroughs; a transformative agenda for NASA. (Applause.)

Now, yes, pursuing this new strategy will require that we revise the old strategy. In part, this is because the old strategy — including the Constellation program — was not fulfilling its promise in many ways. That’s not just my assessment; that’s also the assessment of a panel of respected non-partisan experts charged with looking at these issues closely. Now, despite this, some have had harsh words for the decisions we’ve made, including some individuals who I’ve got enormous respect and admiration for.

But what I hope is, is that everybody will take a look at what we are planning, consider the details of what we’ve laid out, and see the merits as I’ve described them. The bottom line is nobody is more committed to manned space flight, to human exploration of space than I am. (Applause.) But we’ve got to do it in a smart way, and we can’t just keep on doing the same old things that we’ve been doing and thinking that somehow is going to get us to where we want to go.

Some have said, for instance, that this plan gives up our leadership in space by failing to produce plans within NASA to reach low Earth orbit, instead of relying on companies and other countries. But we will actually reach space faster and more often under this new plan, in ways that will help us improve our technological capacity and lower our costs, which are both essential for the long-term sustainability of space flight. In fact, through our plan, we’ll be sending many more astronauts to space over the next decade. (Applause.)

There are also those who criticized our decision to end parts of Constellation as one that will hinder space exploration below [sic] low Earth orbit. But it’s precisely by investing in groundbreaking research and innovative companies that we will have the potential to rapidly transform our capabilities — even as we build on the important work already completed, through projects like Orion, for future missions. And unlike the previous program, we are setting a course with specific and achievable milestones.

Early in the next decade, a set of crewed flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low Earth orbit. (Applause.) And by 2025, we expect new spacecraft designed for long journeys to allow us to begin the first-ever crewed missions beyond the Moon into deep space. (Applause.) So we’ll start — we’ll start by sending astronauts to an asteroid for the first time in history. (Applause.) By the mid-2030s, I believe we can send humans to orbit Mars and return them safely to Earth. And a landing on Mars will follow. And I expect to be around to see it. (Applause.)

But I want to repeat — I want to repeat this: Critical to deep space exploration will be the development of breakthrough propulsion systems and other advanced technologies. So I’m challenging NASA to break through these barriers. And we’ll give you the resources to break through these barriers. And I know you will, with ingenuity and intensity, because that’s what you’ve always done. (Applause.)

Now, I understand that some believe that we should attempt a return to the surface of the Moon first, as previously planned. But I just have to say pretty bluntly here: We’ve been there before. Buzz has been there. There’s a lot more of space to explore, and a lot more to learn when we do. So I believe it’s more important to ramp up our capabilities to reach — and operate at — a series of increasingly demanding targets, while advancing our technological capabilities with each step forward. And that’s what this strategy does. And that’s how we will ensure that our leadership in space is even stronger in this new century than it was in the last. (Applause.)

Finally, I want to say a few words about jobs. Suzanne pointed out to me that the last time I was here, I made a very clear promise that I would help in the transition into a new program to make sure that people who are already going through a tough time here in this region were helped. And despite some reports to the contrary, my plan will add more than 2,500 jobs along the Space Coast in the next two years compared to the plan under the previous administration. So I want to make that point. (Applause.)

We’re going to modernize the Kennedy Space Center, creating jobs as we upgrade launch facilities. And there’s potential for even more jobs as companies in Florida and across America compete to be part of a new space transportation industry. And some of those industry leaders are here today. This holds the promise of generating more than 10,000 jobs nationwide over the next few years. And many of these jobs will be created right here in Florida because this is an area primed to lead in this competition.

Now, it’s true — there are Floridians who will see their work on the shuttle end as the program winds down. This is based on a decision that was made six years ago, not six months ago, but that doesn’t make it any less painful for families and communities affected as this decision becomes reality.

So I’m proposing — in part because of strong lobbying by Bill and by Suzanne, as well as Charlie — I’m proposing a $40 million initiative led by a high-level team from the White House, NASA, and other agencies to develop a plan for regional economic growth and job creation. And I expect this plan to reach my desk by August 15th. (Applause.) It’s an effort that will help prepare this already skilled workforce for new opportunities in the space industry and beyond.

So this is the next chapter that we can write together here at NASA. We will partner with industry. We will invest in cutting-edge research and technology. We will set far-reaching milestones and provide the resources to reach those milestones. And step by step, we will push the boundaries not only of where we can go but what we can do.

Fifty years after the creation of NASA, our goal is no longer just a destination to reach. Our goal is the capacity for people to work and learn and operate and live safely beyond the Earth for extended periods of time, ultimately in ways that are more sustainable and even indefinite. And in fulfilling this task, we will not only extend humanity’s reach in space — we will strengthen America’s leadership here on Earth.

Now, I’ll close by saying this. I know that some Americans have asked a question that’s particularly apt on Tax Day: Why spend money on NASA at all? Why spend money solving problems in space when we don’t lack for problems to solve here on the ground? And obviously our country is still reeling from the worst economic turmoil we’ve known in generations. We have massive structural deficits that have to be closed in the coming years.

But you and I know this is a false choice. We have to fix our economy. We need to close our deficits. But for pennies on the dollar, the space program has fueled jobs and entire industries. For pennies on the dollar, the space program has improved our lives, advanced our society, strengthened our economy, and inspired generations of Americans. And I have no doubt that NASA can continue to fulfill this role. (Applause.) But that is why — but I want to say clearly to those of you who work for NASA, but to the entire community that has been so supportive of the space program in this area: That is exactly why it’s so essential that we pursue a new course and that we revitalize NASA and its mission — not just with dollars, but with clear aims and a larger purpose.

Now, little more than 40 years ago, astronauts descended the nine-rung ladder of the lunar module called Eagle, and allowed their feet to touch the dusty surface of the Earth’s only Moon. This was the culmination of a daring and perilous gambit — of an endeavor that pushed the boundaries of our knowledge, of our technological prowess, of our very capacity as human beings to solve problems. It wasn’t just the greatest achievement in NASA’s history — it was one of the greatest achievements in human history.

And the question for us now is whether that was the beginning of something or the end of something. I choose to believe it was only the beginning.

So thank you. God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America. Thank you. (Applause.)

END
3:21 P.M. EDT

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.