EU-South Africa Space Cooperation Report
July 27, 2009 at 11:03 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The European Council has posted a Space Cooperation Report in relation to cooperation between the EU and South Africa. The report states:
Following the July 2008 EU-South Africa Summit, which identified space as one of the possible areas for future enhanced bilateral cooperation, the JCC approved in October 2008 the Terms of Reference for an EU-South Africa Space Dialogue, prepared together by the European Commission, the South African Department of Science and Technology and the European Space Agency.
The first annual dialogue meeting under these Terms of Reference took place on 27 January 2009 in Pretoria. It offered an opportunity to exchange information on space policy and programmes, which have entered important stages on both sides with the European Space Policy and the adoption of South Africa’s National Space Science and Technology Strategy.
Next to discussions on how this Space Dialogue could promote scientific exchange and the opportunities for South Africa to participate in the relevant future calls under the EU’s 7th Framework Programme, as well as in the ESA science programmes, both sides highlighted the importance and potential for cooperation in the areas of Earth observation and global navigation satellite systems (GNSS).
The participants agreed on the importance of Earth observation as a critical instrument to inform and support policy- and decision-making in the interest of sustainable growth and development.
Cooperation in this area should build on existing contacts and respective initiatives like the South African national Earth observation programmes, the European Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) initiative, and the European Space Agency Earth Observation programs. The parties agreed to also explore opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation in the field of ground segment and data exchange. They highlighted the importance of relevant multilateral cooperation, like in the Group on Earth Observation (GEO), but also the recent GMES-and-Africa initiative as part of the broader Joint Africa-EU Strategy.
In this context, the meeting also reaffirmed the commitment of participants to contribute through their bilateral cooperation in space to the implementation of the Science, Space and Information Society Partnership of the Joint Africa-EU Strategy.
The parties agreed to further develop cooperation with regard to the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System (EGNOS) and to establish relevant focused working groups, including to consider and implement new initiatives, in particular as regards the extension of basic EGNOS performance beyond 20° South over Africa as a first step towards full performance extension, and the installation of elements of the Galileo ground infrastructure in South Africa. Following the Space Dialogue in January in Pretoria, a specific experts meeting was held in June 2009 in Brussels to define a roadmap for the project implementation.
The next meeting of the Space Dialogue should take place in early 2010 in Brussels. It has been agreed to establish a list of contact points in the relevant services and to identify a selected set of concrete areas of cooperation and actions ahead of that meeting.
Alaska: SB 125: An Act changing the name of the Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation to Alaska Aerospace Corporation
July 24, 2009 at 10:55 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
Alaska’s SB 125: An Act changing the name of the Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation to Alaska Aerospace Corporation was signed into law by the governor on June 30, 2009:
AN ACT
Changing the name of the Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation to Alaska Aerospace
Corporation.
_______________
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA:AN ACT
Changing the name of the Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation to Alaska Aerospace Corporation._______________
* Section 1. AS 14.40.821(a) is amended to read:
(a) The Alaska Aerospace [DEVELOPMENT] Corporation is created as a public corporation of the state. The corporation is a body corporate and politic located for administrative purposes within the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development and affiliated with the University of Alaska but with a separate and independent legal existence.
* Sec. 2. The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended by adding a new section to read:
REVISOR’S INSTRUCTION. The revisor of statutes shall substitute “Alaska Aerospace Corporation” for “Alaska Aerospace Development Corporation” in
(1) AS 14.40.841(a), 14.40.951(a), 14.40.956, 14.40.990(1), 14.40.990(2);
(2) AS 24.20.201(a)(12);
(3) AS 36.30.015(e), 36.30.990(1)(B)(vi);
(4) AS 36.90.300(c)(4);
(5) AS 38.05.810(h);
(6) AS 39.25.110(11)(F);
(7) AS 39.50.200(b)(53);
(8) AS 41.23.250(b);
(9) AS 44.12.200(b); and
(10) AS 44.99.030(a)(1), 44.99.400
IMSO Signs LRIT Services Agreement With Ecuador
July 24, 2009 at 10:49 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From the International Maritime Satellite Organization:
IMSO NEWS 019
23 July 2009
IMSO SIGNS LRIT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ECUADORThe IMSO Director General, Captain Esteban Pacha-Vicente, today signed the LRIT Services Agreement between IMSO and the Direccion Nacional de Espacios Acuaticos (DIRNEA) of Ecuador, represented by its National Director Mr Jaime Ayala, in the presence of Captain Remigio Haro, Permanent Representative of Ecuador to IMO and Naval Assistant to the United Kingdom.
IMSO Director General Capt Esteban Pacha (left) presenting a signed LRIT Services Agreement to the Permanent Representative of Ecuador to IMO Capt Remigio Haro (right)
The LRIT Services Agreement, prescribed in the IMSO Convention, establishes the relationship between IMSO, as the LRIT Coordinator appointed by IMO, and the LRIT Data Centre for the audit and review of each Data Centre. A Model LRIT Services Agreement was approved for this purpose by the IMSO Assembly at its 20th session on Malta in 2008.
Ecuador has established a National LRIT Data Centre that started its testing on 30 June 2009 and therefore is expected to be integrated by IMSO into the LRIT production environment as soon as the testing phase is successfully completed.
Captain Pacha expressed his satisfaction with the current level of progress on implementation of the LRIT system worldwide and in particular with the commitment of Ecuador to make it happen by using its own resources. Together with those of Brazil, Chile and Panama, the LRIT Data Centre of Ecuador is the fourth that has been established in the Latin-American region.
A total of 22 LRIT Data Centres have been integrated into the LRIT system and a further 14 LRIT Data Centres, including Ecuador National LRIT Data Centre, have been authorised to start developmental testing by IMO, and expected to be integrated shortly by IMSO. In total, these Centres represent more than 80 percent of the world’s registered fleet.
IMSO continues to be actively involved in the integration process of further LRIT Data Centres, leading to an estimated total of 62 Data Centres overall by the end of 2009.
H. Res. 607: Celebrating the Fortieth Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon Landing
July 24, 2009 at 10:39 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
H. Res. 607: Celebrating the Fortieth Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon Landing was passed by the House of Representatives on July 20, 2009:
HRES 607 EH
H. Res. 607
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
July 20, 2009.
Whereas President John F. Kennedy in his May 25, 1961, speech to Congress set forth the goal of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth;
Whereas the Apollo program was designed to achieve the goal established by President Kennedy by sending a crew of three astronauts to the Moon and returning them safely to the Earth;
Whereas the Apollo program built on the knowledge and experience gained from the Mercury and Gemini human space flight programs, as well as from precursor robotic lunar exploration activities;
Whereas the crew of Apollo 11 consisted of Neil Armstrong, Mission Commander, Buzz Aldrin, Lunar Module Pilot, and Michael Collins, Command Module Pilot;
Whereas the crew of Apollo 11 launched into space aboard a Saturn V rocket on July 16, 1969, on a 4-day trip to the Moon;
Whereas, on July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin successfully piloted the Eagle Lunar Module to the surface of the Moon;
Whereas, on July 20, 1969, when Neil Armstrong took his first step on the Moon, he became the first person to walk on the surface of another celestial body;
Whereas the Apollo 11 Moon landing was the culmination of the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists, engineers, and other dedicated individuals and organizations;
Whereas the Apollo 11 Moon landing was experienced by millions of people all around the world by means of radio and television broadcasts;
Whereas the Apollo 11 astronauts left a plaque on the lunar surface that stated: `We came in peace for all mankind’;
Whereas the successful Apollo 11 Moon landing was one of the most significant events of the 20th century and inspired a generation to strive towards great accomplishments in space and on Earth; and
Whereas the Apollo 11 achievement continues to inspire Americans as we prepare for future human journeys back to the Moon and other destinations in the solar system: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–
(1) celebrates the 40th Anniversary of the Apollo 11 lunar landing;
(2) honors the brave crew of the Apollo 11 mission–Neil Armstrong, `Buzz’ Aldrin, and Michael Collins; and
(3) commends all those individuals and organizations who contributed to such a historic achievement that continues to be an inspiration to the Nation and the world.
Attest:
Clerk.
S. Res. 222: A resolution recognizing Lieutenant Commander Chris Cassidy, space shuttle mission specialist of the STS-127 space shuttle mission and the Expedition 19 International Space Station mission, for becoming the 500th person to fly into space.
July 24, 2009 at 10:34 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
S. Res. 222: A resolution recognizing Lieutenant Commander Chris Cassidy, space shuttle mission specialist of the STS-127 space shuttle mission and the Expedition 19 International Space Station mission, for becoming the 500th person to fly into space was introduced on July 23, 2009 by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME). The text is not yet available.
Apollo 11 Customs Form
July 24, 2009 at 10:31 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
After the Apollo 11 astronauts returned to Earth, they had to do what everybody does when entering the United States: go through customs. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has posted a copy of the customs form filed on behalf of the astronauts at the Honolulu Airport the day they returned to the Earth. More at Space.com.
Protecting Civil Aviation from MANPADS Attacks: New Milestone Reached
July 24, 2009 at 10:14 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From the Department of State:
Protecting Civil Aviation from MANPADS Attacks: New Milestone Reached
Bureau of Public Affairs
Office of the Spokesman
Washington, DC
July 23, 2009
Date: 06/01/2009 Description: A foreign affairs officer in the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs displays a foreign Man-Portable Air Defense System missile in its tube that has been prepared carefully for destruction–one of the 30,000 MANPADS that the U.S. has helped other countries destroy since 2003. © Photo by Dave Diaz, Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement
The United States in close cooperation with 29 countries has destroyed over 30,000 foreign, at-risk Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) since 2003, thus potentially preventing these weapons – commonly referred to as shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles – from falling into the hands of arms traffickers, criminals, and terrorists who could threaten civil aviation.
The threat posed by MANPADS to civil aviation is real. Forty civilian aircraft have been hit by these missiles since the 1970s. A total of 859 deaths resulted from these attacks.
The United States salutes the countries that have worked cooperatively to reduce their excess, aging stocks of MANPADS. The United States encourages all nations to voluntarily reduce the MANPADS and other conventional weapons that are not essential to their defense needs, and to reduce their old and unstable munitions.
The U.S. Department of State appreciates the assistance of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Transportation Security Administration, Organization of American States, NATO’s Partnership for Peace Program, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the Regional Center on Small Arms in Kenya, and other international organizations for their vital collaboration on MANPADS threat reduction initiatives to make the world’s skies safer for airline passengers and international aviation.
As part of the U.S. Government’s inter-agency threat reduction response to the misuse of these light, easily concealed weapons, the Transportation Security Administration has since 2003 conducted 33 “Assist Visits” to airports in 26 countries in order to help the host nations identify vulnerabilities to potential MANPADS attacks, at a cost of approximately $500,000.
Since 2001, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs has invested over $113 million to help destroy 1.3 million small arms and other conventional weapons around the world, including these more than 30,000 MANPADS. In fiscal year 2009, the Bureau’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement is investing approximately $130 million to destroy MANPADS and other conventional weapons, and to conduct humanitarian mine action in a continuous effort to make the world safer.
Visit www.state.gov/t/pm/wra to learn more about the Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement’s conventional weapons destruction and humanitarian mine action programs.
PRN: 2009/770
S. 1497: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-exempt bond financing for fixed-wing emergency medical aircraft
July 24, 2009 at 10:09 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
S. 1497: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow tax-exempt bond financing for fixed-wing emergency medical aircraft was introduced on July 22, 2009 by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA). The text is not yet available.
United Kingdom: 2009 No. 2051 The Aircraft Operators (Accounts and Records) (Amendment) Regulations 2009
July 23, 2009 at 9:32 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The United Kingdom’s Statutory Instrument 2009 No. 2051: The Aircraft Operators (Accounts and Records) (Amendment) Regulations 2009 (PDF) was made on 22 July 2009, laid before Parliament on 23 July 2009, and comes into force on 1 November 2009. According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the purpose of the Act is:
2.1 This instrument amends the Aircraft Operators (Accounts and Records) Regulations 1994 (S.I. 1994/1737) (“the principal Regulations”).
2.2 Following the introduction in the Finance Act 2009 of additional destination bands for the purposes of determining the rate of air passenger duty (“APD”)charged, this instrument amends the particulars specified in the principal Regulations that an aircraft operator has to keep in relation to the number of passengers carried at each duty rate.
United Kingdom: 2009 No. 2045 The Air Passenger Duty (Amendment) Regulations 2009
July 23, 2009 at 9:26 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The United Kingdom’s Statutory Instrument 2009 No. 2045: The Air Passenger Duty (Amendment) Regulations 2009 (PDF) was made on 21 July 2009, laid before the House of Commons on 23 July 2009, comes into force on 1 November 2009. According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the purpose of the act is:
2.1 This instrument cancels, with effect from 1 November 2009, Schedule 3 to the Air Passenger Duty Regulations 1994 (S.I. 1994/1738) (“the APD Regulations”) which contained the form of the air passenger duty (“APD”) return and provides instead that an APD return must be made on the form specified in a notice published by HMRC.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

