Library: A Round-up of Reading
May 19, 2009 at 12:28 pm | Posted in Library | Leave a commentArticles
Taylor Dinerman, NASA and the book of laws, The Space Review
Books
NRC – Assessment of Planetary Protection Requirements for Mars Sample Return Missions
Reports
Aviation Security: TSA Has Completed Key Activities Associated with Implementing Secure Flight, but Additional Actions Are Needed to Mitigate Risks. GAO-09-292, May 13.
Blogs
An Intriguing Question – NSGIC
Texas Bill to Require Disclaimer on Geospatial Data – All Points
What Can the World Do About Space Debris? An Urgent Call to Action – Secure World Foundation
Spy Satellites Being Used to Track Drug Dealers on Mexican Border – Got GEOINT?
DNI Pushes Spy Sat Shakeup – DoD Buzz
The date to appeal Judge Walton’s ruling, which vacated the classification of APCP as an explosive, has come and gone – Dick’s Rocket Dungeon
Director of National Intelligence to Revamp National Reconnaissance Office – Got GEOINT?
Disasters Charter: Flood in Afganistan
May 19, 2009 at 11:27 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The Disasters Charter has been activated for a flood in Afganistan:
Flood in Afghanistan
Type of Event: Flood
Location of Event: Afghanistan
Date of Charter Activation: 19/05/2009
Charter Requestor: UNOOSA on behalf of OCHA Afghanistan
Description of Event
According to assessments conducted to date, floods have affected approximately 10,000 households in five provinces in the Northern region (Jawzjan, Faryab, Balkh, Samangan and Sari Pul) and four provinces in the Northeastern region (Kunduz, Baghlan, Takhar and Badakhshan). Flooding in the north and northeast is expected to continue and worsen, due to heavy rains and to snow melting.
White House Press Secretary on NASA Administrator
May 19, 2009 at 11:23 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From the White House:
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release May 18, 2009
PRESS BRIEFING
BY
PRESS SECRETARY ROBERT GIBBSJames S. Brady Press Briefing Room
3:42 P.M. EDT
. . .Q A couple of things. Are we going to hear anything about the NASA administrator and hear it today and –MR. GIBBS: You won’t hear it today because of the Netanyahu meetings going longer. The visit with Mr. Bolden will be tomorrow morning. . . .
. . . Q Just quickly, to close the circle on NASA, is Bolden the President’s choice and will that happen tomorrow?
MR. GIBBS: Well, I don’t want to get ahead of the President’s meeting with him, but I know he’s anxious to have strong leadership at NASA. I think we’ve all watched and read about the mission that’s going on right now and the amazing efforts that are being undertaken with consecutive, multi-hour space walks to repair the Hubble telescope. So we may have something after that meeting but not until then. . . .
Disasters Charter: Landslide in Tajikistan
May 19, 2009 at 2:07 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The Disasters Charter has been activated:
Landslide in Tajikistan
Type of Event: Landslide
Location of Event: Republic of Tajikistan
Date of Charter Activation: 14/05/2009
Charter Requestor: UNOOSA on behalf of UNDP Tajikistan
Description of Event
Unusually powerful mudslides have killed at least 18 people so far in the Central Asian Republic of Tajikistan. According to initial reports, more than 200 houses have been affected.
Open Skies Treaty
May 19, 2009 at 1:58 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From the Department of State:
Open Skies Treaty
Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation
Fact Sheet
May 18, 2009Origin and Purpose
The Treaty on Open Skies entered into force on January 1, 2002, and currently has 34 States Parties. The Treaty establishes a regime of unarmed aerial observation flights over the entire territory of its participants. The Treaty is designed to enhance mutual understanding and confidence by giving all participants, regardless of size, a direct role in gathering information about military forces and activities of concern to them. Open Skies is one of the most wide-ranging international efforts to date to promote openness and transparency of military forces and activities.
The original concept of mutual aerial observation was proposed by President Eisenhower in 1955; the Treaty itself was an initiative of then-President George H.W. Bush in 1989. The Treaty was negotiated by the then-members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, and was signed in Helsinki, Finland, on March 24, 1992. Provisional application of portions of the Treaty took place from signature in 1992 until entry into force in 2002. During that period, participants conducted joint trial flights for the purpose of training mission crews and testing equipment and sensors. With entry into force of the Treaty, formal observation flights began in August 2002. States Parties have conducted over 530 observation flights over each other’s territory.
Since the signature of the Open Skies Treaty in 1992, the security environment in Europe has changed significantly. The Open Skies Treaty continues to contribute toward European security by enhancing openness and transparency among the Parties.
Membership
The 34 States Parties to the Open Skies Treaty are: Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, Ukraine, and United States. Kyrgyzstan has signed but not yet ratified. The Treaty depositaries are Canada and Hungary.
The Treaty is of unlimited duration and open to accession by other States. States of the former Soviet Union which have not already become States Parties to the Treaty may accede to it at any time. Applications from other interested States are subject to a consensus decision by the Open Skies Consultative Commission (OSCC), the Vienna-based organization charged with facilitating implementation of the Treaty, to which all States Parties belong. Eight states have acceded to the Treaty since entry into force: Finland, Sweden, Latvia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia, Estonia, and Lithuania. One application for accession is pending before the OSCC.
Basic Elements of the Treaty
Territory. The Open Skies regime covers the territory over which the State Party exercises sovereignty, including – land, islands, and internal and territorial waters. The Treaty specifies that the entire territory of a State Party is open to observation. Observation flights may only be restricted for reasons of flight safety; not for reasons of national security.
Aircraft. Observation aircraft may be provided by either the observing Party or by the observed Party (the “taxi option”), at the latter’s choice. All Open Skies aircraft and sensors must pass specific certification and pre-flight inspection procedures to ensure that they are compliant with Treaty standards. Certified Open Skies aircraft include:
* Bulgaria An-30
* Hungary An-26
* POD Group C-130H & J (Benelux, Canada, France, Greece, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain)
* Romania An-30
* Russian Federation An-30 and TU-154
* Sweden Saab-340B
* Turkey Casa CN-235
* Ukraine An-30B
* United States OC-135BSensors. Open Skies aircraft may have video, optical panoramic and framing cameras for daylight photography, infra-red line scanners for a day/night capability, and synthetic aperture radar for a day/night all weather capability. Photographic image quality will permit recognition of major military equipment (e.g., permit a State Party to distinguish between a tank and a truck), thus allowing significant transparency of military forces and activities. Sensor categories may be added and capabilities improved by agreement among States Parties. All equipment used in Open Skies must be commercially available to all participants in the regime.
Quotas. Each State Party is obligated to receive observation flights per its passive quota allocation. Each State Party may conduct as many observation flights – its active quota – as its passive quota. The Russian Federation and the United States each have an annual passive quota of 42, and other States Parties have a quota of 12 or fewer. The Parties negotiate the annual distribution of the active quotas each October for the following calendar year. Over 100 observation flights are conducted each year.
Data Sharing/Availability. Imagery collected from Open Skies missions is available to any State Party upon request for the cost of reproduction. As a result, the data available to each State Party is much greater than that which it can collect itself under the Treaty quota system.
Implementation of the Treaty
In July 2008, under U.S. OSCC Chairmanship, States Parties commemorated the conduct of 500 observation flights since the Treaty entered into force.
The OSCC continues to address modalities for conducting observation missions and other implementation issues. The OSCC meets in three sessions per year, with monthly plenary meetings. The OSCC has several informal working groups that take up technical issues related to sensors, notification formats, aircraft certification and rules and procedures. The OSCC main functions are to:
* consider questions relating to compliance with the Treaty;
* seek to resolve ambiguities and differences of interpretation emerging during Treaty implementation;
* consider and decide on applications for accession to the Treaty; and
* review the distribution of active quotas annually.The OSCC was established by Article X and Annex L of the Treaty, and has been in session since Treaty signature in March 1992. The OSCC takes decisions by consensus, and has adopted over 90 Decisions since its inception. OSCC Decisions enter into force with the Treaty and have the same duration as the Treaty.
State Department point of contact is Diana Marvin, 202-647-5357.
Note: This Treaty is not related to civil-aviation open skies agreements.
GLONASS to Recieve Full State Support
May 18, 2009 at 6:42 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From Space Daily:
Russia Glonass System To Get Full State Support
-
by Staff Writers
Mosow (RIA Novosti) May 15, 2009
Russia will not cut funding for its Glonass satellite navigation program despite the current economic crisis
, a deputy prime minister said on Tuesday.Glonass – the Global Navigation Satellite System – is the Russian equivalent of the U.S. Global Positioning System, or GPS, and is designed for both military and civilian use. Both systems allow users to determine their positions to within a few meters.
“Despite economic difficulties financing [for the Glonass program] in 2009 will remain unchanged, without any cuts or limitations,” Sergei Ivanov said at the International Satellite Navigation Forum in Moscow. . . . [Full Story]
Proceedings of Air Transport, Air & Space Law and Regulation Workshop and Conference, April 12-16, 2009, Abu Dhabi (UAE)
May 18, 2009 at 6:21 am | Posted in Aviation Law, Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with blog faculty
McGill Institute of Air and Space Law has made presentations and other documents from its Air Transport, Air & Space Law and Regulation Workshop and Conference, April 12-16, 2009, Abu Dhabi (UAE) available online.
Federal Register: Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
May 18, 2009 at 6:15 am | Posted in Space Law | 1 Commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
NASA published a Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. in May 15, 2009′s Federal Register:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 09-040]
Notice of Establishment of a NASA Advisory Committee, Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Explanation of Need: The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has determined that the establishment of a Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee is necessary and in the public interest in connection with duties imposed upon NASA by law. This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.
Name of Committee: Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Purpose and Objective: The Committee shall conduct an independent review of ongoing U.S. human space flight plans and programs, as well as alternatives, to ensure that the nation is pursuing the best trajectory for the future of human space flight–one that is safe, innovative, affordable, and sustainable. The Committee should aim to identify and characterize a range of options that spans the reasonable possibilities for continuation of U.S. human space flight activities beyond retirement of the Space Shuttle. The identification and characterization of these options should address the following objectives: (a) Expediting a new U.S. capability to support utilization of the International Space Station (ISS); (b) supporting missions to the Moon and other destinations beyond low Earth orbit (LEO); (c) stimulating commercial space flight capability; and (d) fitting within the current budget profile for NASA exploration activities.
In addition to the objectives described above, the review should examine the appropriate amount of R&D and complementary robotic activities needed to make human space flight activities most productive and affordable over the long term, as well as appropriate opportunities for international collaboration. It should also evaluate what capabilities would be enabled by each of the potential architectures considered. It should evaluate options for extending International Space Station operations beyond 2016. The Committee shall conduct meetings as appropriate at various locations throughout the United States. The Committee will provide advice only and will comply fully with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). . . .
U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary to Consider 2 Versions of Title 51, United States Code National and Commercial Space Program; One Version Includes Space Transportation, One Version Excludes Space Transportation
May 15, 2009 at 3:09 pm | Posted in Space Law, Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz with the blog faculty
Source: U.S. House of Representatives
TITLE 49 TRANSFERS
Whether to transfer chapters 701 and 703 of title 49, United States Code, into title 51, United States Code, has been a source of concern for some time. The Office of the Law Revision Counsel, in consultation with the Committee on the Judiciary, has decided to prepare two versions of the bill that are complete and current. One version does makes the transfers; the other does not. The hope is that having two fully realized drafts will facilitate comparison of the alternatives and ultimately lead to resolution allowing the bill to move forward.
For the version that DOES make the title 49 transfers, see this BILL (yes T49 transfers).pdf and accompanying EXPLANATION (yes T49 transfers).pdf.
For the version that does NOT make the title 49 transfers, see this BILL (no T49 transfers).pdf and accompanying EXPLANATION (no T49 transfers).pdf.
The key difference between versions is found in section 4(d) of the bill, which appears on page 136, at line 23.
Medvedev endorses national security strategy until 2020
May 15, 2009 at 9:18 am | Posted in Space Law, Space Law Current Events | Leave a commentby Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz with the blog faculty
Source: ITAR/TASS
MOSCOW, May 13 (Itar-Tass) – Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed the decree on strategy of national security of the Russian Federation until 2020, the Kremlin press service reported.
The decree is aimed at consolidating the efforts by federal executive bodies, government bodies in the Russian regions, and organizations and citizens in the sphere of national security.
The full Russian text of the strategy is published on the website of the Russian Security Council at the address http://www.scrf.gov.ru
The preamble of the document notes that prerequisites have been formed to prevent threats to Russia’s national security. Russia is on the way of becoming one of the leading powers in terms of technological progress, standards of living of the population and influence upon world processes.
“In the conditions of globalization of world development processes and international political and economic relations, which form new threats and risks to the development of the individual, the society and the state,” Russia is adopting a new state policy in the field of national security, as a guarantee of safe national development.
According to the strategy, the main threat to Russia’s national security is the policy pursued by certain leading states, which is aimed at attaining military superiority over Russia, in the first place in strategic nuclear forces.
“The threats to military security are the policy by a number of leading foreign states, aimed at attaining dominant superiority in the military sphere, in the first place in strategic nuclear forces, by developing high-precision, information and other high-tech means of warfare, strategic armaments with non-nuclear ordnance, the unilateral formation of the global missile defense system and militarization of outer space, which is capable of bringing about a new spiral of the arms race, as well as the development of nuclear, chemical and biological technologies, the production of weapons of mass destruction or their components and delivery vehicles,” the document said.
“The negative influence on the condition of military security of Russia and its allies is exacerbated by the withdrawal from intentional accords in the fields of limitation and reduction of armaments, as well as by the actions aimed at unbalancing the systems of state and military control, missile warning, outer space monitoring, the functioning of strategic nuclear forces, the nuclear armaments storage facilities, nuclear power plants, and atomic and chemical industries and other potentially dangerous facilities,” it said.
Russia’s long-term national interests include “the development of democracy and civil society,” and the efforts towards enhancing “the competitiveness of national economy.”
One of the objectives is to make the Russian Federation “a world power, whose activity is aimed at maintaining strategic stability and mutually advantageous partnership in the conditions of a multi-polar world.”
“An improvement of the standard of living of Russian citizens by guaranteeing personal safety; high welfare standards; economic growth, which is attained in the first place by developing the national innovation system and investments in human potential, science, technologies, education, health care and culture, developed by means of strengthening the role of the state and perfecting state-private partnership,” the document said.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

