Library: A Round-up of Reading
January 20, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Posted in Library | Leave a commentArticles
Masako Toki, Missile defense in Japan, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Taylor Dinnerman, Contract protests: a growing cancer on the space industry, The Space Review
ZLW, 2008/4:
Milde, Michael “Rendition Flights” and International Air Law/ “Auslieferungsflüge” und Internationales Luftrecht/ “Vols de reconduit” et le droit aérien international - 477
Kämper, Norbert, Das selbstständige Genehmigungsverfahren für Flugplätze (Teil I)/ Independent Authorisation Procedure for Aerodromes in Germany (Part I)/ Procédure indépendante pour l´autorisation des aérodromes en Allemagne (1ère partie) – 487
Geisler, Markus – Boewe, Marius, Zu neuen Entwicklungen im Bereich der Slot-Vergabe. Die Mitteilung der Europäischen Kommission zur Auslegung relevanter Rechtsvorschriften/ New Developments Relating to Slot Allocation in Europe/ Nouveaux développements relatifs aux allocations des slots en Europe – 501
Bentzien, Joachim, Der Überflug als Rechtsproblem/ Problems Relating to the “First Freedom” of the Air/ Problèmes relatifs à la “remière liberté”de l’air – 508
Milde, Michael, Liability for Damage Caused by Aircraft on the Surface: Past and Current Efforts to Unify the Law/ Zur Haftung für Schäden, die Dritten auf der Erde durch Luftfahrzeuge zugefügt werden: Arbeiten zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung/ Responsabilité pour dommages causés aux tiers à la surface par des aéronefs: travaux concernant l’unification du droit -532
Froehlich, Annette, Analyse de la proposition sur la communautarisation du Centre Spatial Guyanais (CSG)/ Zum französischen Vorschlag, den Weltraumbahnhof in Französisch Guyana zu einer Einrichtug der EU zu machen/ Analyzing the French Proposal of Transforming the Space Center in French Guyana into an EU-Institution – 558
Kim, Doo Hwan, Space Law in Korea: Existing Regulations and Future Tasks/ Koreanisches Weltraumrecht: Regelungen und Perspektiven/ Le droit spatial Coréen: règlements et perspectives – 571
Aoki, Setsuko, Introduction to the Japanese Basic Space Law of 2008/ Überblick über das Japanische Weltraumbasisgesetz 2008/ Introduction à la loi (de base) spatiale 2008 Japonaise – 585
Tagungsberichte / Reports of Conferences / Conférences et Congrès – 590
* Deutsche Luftfahrt Tage, München, 03./04. Dezember 2007 von Guido Kleve und Thilo StreitGesetzgebung / Legislation / Législation – 598
Multilaterlale Übereinkommen
Nationale GesetzgebungRechtsprechung / Judicial Decisions / Jurisprudence – 669
* Europäischer Gerichtshof, Urteil vom 10. Juli 2008 (C-173/07). Zur Anwendung der EG Verordnung Nr. 261/2004 Art. 3 Abs. 1 Buchst. a vom 11. Februar 2004. Für den Fall dass ein Flug auf dem Gebiet eines Mitgliedsstaates angetreten wurde, die Rückreise jedoch aus einem Drittstaat erfolgt. Mit Anmerkung von Rechtsanwalt Dr. Christian Giesecke* Bundesverwaltungsgericht, Urteil vom 21. Februar 2008 (4 C 13.07). Flughafen Frankfurt/M: Zugang zu Umweltinformationen (CADECDatei) im Rahmen des Planfeststellungsverfahrens im Hinblick auf den Flughafenausbau
* Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht, Urteil vom 20. September 2007 (3 U 30/07). Zum Umfang der Leistungspflicht einer Luftverkehrsgesellschaft bei sog. “Ab-Preisen” für Flugtickets. Mit Anmerkung von Rechtsanwalt Ulrich Steppler
* Landsgericht Düsseldorf, Urteil vom 23. Oktober 2007 (22 S 190/07). Widrige Wetterbedingungen als höhere Gewalt bei der Beförderung im Luftverkehr. Mit Anmerkung von Rechtsanwalt Philip Makiol Amtsgericht Hannover, Urteil vom 5. November 2007 (449 C 11176/07). Kein Anspruch auf anteilige Rückerstattung des Ticketpreises in Höhe des Treibstoffzuschlages, auch wenn er im Nachhinein als ungerechtfertigt erscheint, wenn der Ticketpreis bei der Buchung als Endpreis akzeptiert wurde Mit Anmerkung von Rechtsanwalt Philip Makiol
* Amtsgericht Köln, Urteil vom 30. Juni 2008 (111 C 126/08). Keine Haftung des Luftfahrtunternehmens bei streikbedingter Nichtbeförderung. Mit Anmerkung von Rechtsanwalt Philip Makiol und Rechtsanwältin Ingrid Harke
Schrifttum / Book Reviews / Bibliographie – 698
* Fritzsche, Steffen, Das europäische Luftverkehrsrecht und die Liberalisierung des transatlantischen Luftverkehrsmarktes, Schriften zum transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH, Berlin, 2007 (Steppler)* Böhme, Ralf, Innere Einsätze der Streitkräfte beim Katastrophenschutz im Frieden. Schriftenreihe Verfassungsrecht in Forschung und Praxis,
Band 47, Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg, 2007 (Schladebach)* Oschmann, Frank / Stober, Rolf (Hrsg.): Luftsicherheit. Luftsicherheit zwischen Staat und Privat. Der Faktor Sicherheitsgewerbe an Flughäfen,
Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln, 2007 (Schladebach)* Hettling, Jana, Satellite Imagery for Verification and Enforcement of Public International Law, Schriften zum Luft- und Weltraumrecht Bd.
25, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln, 2008 (Schrogl)* Schwab, Maximilian, Sachenrechtliche Grundlagen der kommerziellen Weltraumnutzung, Schriften zum Luft- und Weltraumrecht Bd. 26, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln, 2008 (Schrogl)
* Pelton, Joseph N. with Marshall, Peter, Space Exploration and Astronaut Safety, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Reston, 2007 (Schrogl)
* Richter, Steffen, Luftsicherheit – Schutz vor Angriffen auf den zivilen Luftverkehr, Richard Boorberg Verlag, Stuttgart, 2007 (Kaiser)
* Winkeler, Frank, Bedingt abwehrbereit? Die verfassungsrechtliche Zulässigkeit von Gefahrenabwehrmaßnahmen auf Kosten Unschuldiger am Beispiel des Luftsicherheitsgesetzes, Schriften zum Recht der Inneren Sicherheit Band 9, Richard Boorberg Verlag, Stuttgart, 2007 (Kaiser)
Veröffentlichungen auf dem Gebiet des Luft- und Weltraumrechts / Recent Publications / Nouvelles Publications
708
Newsletters & Magazines
Orbital Debris Quarterly News (V. 13/1)
MilSat Magazine (January 2009)
SGAC Newsletter (Jan. 2009)
Reports
AIA – The Role of Space in Addressing America’s National Priorities
Blogs
Export Controls Now Threaten National Security, Panel Says – Secrecy News
UN-COPUOS Meeting in February 2009 (NEOs) – Planetary Defense
KC-X procurement faces deferral – Leeham News and Comment
Planetspace officially protest NASA’s CRS selection – NASA Spaceflight
American Recovery and Reinvestment Bill – and NASA – NASA Watch
Student Pilot’s Passenger Carrying Flight Results In Revocation Of Certificate – Aviation Law Discussions
Mars, The Bringer of War – Women and Foreign Policy
China fines UK students for “illegal map-making” – GeoData Policy
Seeking more stimulus – Space Politics
A “National GIS” for the United States – GeoData Policy
Coalition of Geospatial Organizations (COGO) urges Congress to establish Geospatial Subcommittee in House and Senate – GeoData Policy
WIREdata Court Case – Implications for Geospatial Data – GeoData Policy
Social Networking Enabled Rogue Sat Shootdown – Danger Room
NTSB Chief Law Judge Dismisses FAA Emergency Order of Revocation
January 20, 2009 at 11:37 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From Aero-News Network:
NTSB Chief Law Judge Dismisses FAA Emergency Order of Revocation
Sun, 18 Jan ’09
Judge Says Case Should Never Have Been Brought Against MechanicFollowing a two-day hearing in Philadelphia, the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the National Transportation Safety Board dismissed an emergency order issued by the Federal Aviation Administration that sought revocation of the Airframe & Powerplant, Inspection Authorization, and Commercial Pilot certificates held by a New Jersey aircraft mechanic.
The FAA alleged that during an annual inspection, the mechanic made a fraudulent or intentionally false maintenance record entry concerning the Emergency Locator Transmitter battery, and that he returned the aircraft to service with airframe corrosion. . . .[Full Story]
FCC Approves Stratos License Transfer to Inmarsat
January 20, 2009 at 10:46 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From Satellite Today:
FCC Approves Stratos License Transfer to Inmarsat
January 20, 2009[Satellite Today 01-20-09] The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued an order approving the transfer of Stratos Global’s FCC licenses to Inmarsat, the operator announced Jan. 19.
In December, Inmarsat announced that its subsidiary, Inmarsat Finance 3, a call option over the Stratos shares, which are held in an irrevocable trust.
The call option can be exercised no earlier than April 15. The exercise of the call option remains subject to certain other governmental approvals, which are expected to be obtained before April. 15, Inmarsat said.
Memorandum for the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
January 16, 2009 at 2:36 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From the White House:
Memorandum for the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
SUBJECT: Designation of Officers of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration To Act as AdministratorBy the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that:
Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this memorandum, the following officials of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Administrator of NASA (Administrator), during any period in which both the Administrator and Deputy Administrator of NASA (Deputy Administrator) have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Administrator, until such time as the Administrator or Deputy Administrator is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:
(a) Associate Administrator;
(b) Chief of Staff to the NASA Administrator;
(c) Director for Johnson Space Flight Center;
(d) Director for Kennedy Space Flight Center; and
(e) Director for Marshall Space Flight Center.
Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Administrator pursuant to this memorandum. (b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Administrator unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Administrator.
Sec. 3. This memorandum is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, it agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Sec. 4. You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
GEORGE W. BUSH
H. Res. 67: Recognizing and commending the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Cornell University for the success of the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, on the 5th anniversary of the Rovers’ successful landing.
January 16, 2009 at 2:34 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
H. Res. 67: Recognizing and commending the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Cornell University for the success of the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, on the 5th anniversary of the Rovers’ successful landing was introduced on January 15, 2009 by Rep. David Dreier (R-CA):
Recognizing and commending the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Cornell University for the success of the Mars Exploration… (Introduced in House)
HRES 67 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 67
Recognizing and commending the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Cornell University for the success of the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, on the 5th anniversary of the Rovers’ successful landing.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 15, 2009
Mr. DREIER (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. WU, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. CULBERSON, and Mr. CALVERT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology
RESOLUTION
Recognizing and commending the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and Cornell University for the success of the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, on the 5th anniversary of the Rovers’ successful landing.
Whereas the Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity successfully landed on Mars on January 3, 2004, and January 24, 2004, respectively, on missions to search for evidence indicating that Mars once held conditions hospitable to life;
Whereas NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), managed by the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), designed and built the Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity;
Whereas Cornell University led the development of advanced scientific instruments carried by the 2 Rovers, and continues to play a leading role in the operation of the 2 Rovers and the processing and analysis of the images and other data sent back to Earth;
Whereas the Rovers relayed over a quarter million images taken from the surface of Mars;
Whereas studies conducted by the Rovers have indicated that early Mars was characterized by impacts, explosive volcanoes, and subsurface water;
Whereas each Rover has discovered geological evidence of ancient Martian environments where habitable conditions may have existed;
Whereas the Rovers have explored over 21 kilometers of Martian terrain, climbed Martian hills, descended deep into large craters, survived dust storms, and endured 3 cold, dark Martian winters; and
Whereas Spirit and Opportunity will have passed 5 years of successful operation on the surface of Mars on January 3, 2009, and January 24, 2009, respectively, far exceeding the original 90-Martian day mission requirement by a factor of 20, and are continuing their missions of surface exploration and scientific discovery: Now therefore be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives–
(1) commends the engineers, scientists, and technicians of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Cornell University for their successful execution and continued operation of the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity; and
(2) recognizes the success and significant scientific contributions of NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers.
NASA Puts ISS Resupply Contracts on Hold
January 16, 2009 at 1:57 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
From Reuters:
NASA awards to space station cargo haulers on hold
Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:27pm ESTBy Irene Klotz
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Jan 15 (Reuters) – NASA is suspending contract awards to two firms selected to fly cargo to the International Space Station after a third contender formally protested the outcome of the competition, officials said on Thursday.
PlanetSpace, a Chicago-based partnership set up by three of the U.S. space agency’s prime contractors — Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N), Boeing Co (BA.N) and Alliant Techsystems Inc (ATK.N) — filed its protest with the U.S. Government Accountability Office on Wednesday contesting contracts awarded last month. . . [Full Story]
Order of the Government of the Russian Federation from 24.12.2008 N 1961-r
January 16, 2009 at 1:55 pm | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
Roscosmos reports that Order of the Government of the Russian Federation from 24.12.2008 N 1961-r has passed (unofficial Google Translation):
16-01-2009 approved the composition of the State Commission for the flight tests of manned space complexes
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation approved the composition of the State Commission for the flight tests of manned space complexes.
Chairman of the Commission appointed Roscosmos head Anatoly Perminov. Vice-Chairman of the Commission appointed: Head of Roscosmos Alexei Krasnov, president of RSC Energia Vitaly Lopota, deputy director general of Russian Central Research Institute for Machine Building “Valery Grin. The commission includes representatives of federal executive authorities, representatives of organizations of rocket and space industry, representatives of the Armed Forces of Russia.
By Internet portal of the Russian Federation Government
http://gov.consultant.ru/doc.asp?ID=50188&PSC=1&PT=3&Page=2
The Decree is available in Russian.
This is an unofficial translation and is provided to the readership of Res Communis as a convenience.
South Africa’s Space Agency Act Signed into Law
January 16, 2009 at 9:11 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
The National Space Agency Act of 2008 has been signed into law by South African President Kgalema Motlanthe:
Space Agency Act blasts off
BY AUDRA MAHLONG , JOURNALIST[ Johannesburg, 16 January 2009 ] – President Kgalema Motlanthe has signed the National Space Agency Act Bill into law.
This will allow for the creation of the SA National Space Agency (Sansa), a public entity that will be tasked with the co-ordination and integration of various national space science and technology programmes. It will also conduct long-term planning for and implementation of space-related activities in SA.
The Department of Science and Technology stated the agency would be responsible for the promotion of the peaceful use of outer space; foster research in astronomy, earth observation, communications, navigation and space physics; foster international cooperation in space-related activities; and advance scientific, engineering and technological competencies through human capital development. . . . [Full Story]
According to the act as published in the Government Gazette, the President’s assent took place on December 11, 2008.
PlanetSpace Files Bid Protest Decision
January 15, 2009 at 10:24 am | Posted in Space Law | Leave a commentby P.J. Blount with the blog faculty
PlanetSpace Press Release:
PLANETSPACE HAS FILED WITH THE GAO A PROTEST TO THE SELECTION DECISION OF NASA UNDER THE ISS COMMERCIAL RESUPPLY SERVICES (CRS) COMPETITION
Chicago, IL. January 14, 2009-PlanetSpace has filed with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) a protest to the selection decision of NASA under the ISS Commercial Resupply Services (CRS) competition, RFP NNJ08ZBG001R.
After a careful review of all the facts and in consideration of all of the source selection documentation provided to date, PlanetSpace has filed a protest to NASA’s award of the ISS Commercial Resupply Services Contract. PlanetSpace offered a superior proposal. It received a higher Mission Suitability score, from NASA’s Source Evaluation Board (SEB), and was lower in Cost than one of the two proposals selected by NASA. Thus, the PlanetSpace proposal represented better value to the Government. We believe that the GAO will find that flaws in the procurement justify award to PlanetSpace. We look forward to the GAO’s review of this case.
PlanetSpace has assembled a subcontract team, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing and ATK, with over 150 years of collective experience in supporting NASA spaceflight programs. The resources and record of this team were recognized by the SEB, as it gave the subcontractors an “excellent” mark for their “Past Performance.” The commitment and capabilities of the team reduce risk to NASA and will ensure success of the critical mission of assured resupply to the Space Station. Further favoring selection of PlanetSpace, we have proposed an “ALL-U.S.” solution for CRS – something that ought to be a domestic priority in light of current economic conditions.The PlanetSpace ISS CRS proposal provides NASA, and the United States taxpayer, with a credible space transportation system, derived from largely proven hardware, so that NASA will have highly reliable, on-demand, ISS cargo delivery and return services. Our solution reduces ISS resupply risk to NASA and thus will allow NASA to focus its resources on other space priorities, such as moving America’s space program beyond low earth orbit.
PlanetSpace will make no other statements publicly regarding this protest at this time. The law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP acts as protest counsel for PlanetSpace. For questions regarding the GAO protest process, contact C. Joel Van Over, Partner. Tel: (703) 770-7604. Email: joel.vanover@pillsburylaw.com.
The GAO listing in the bid protest docket gives the following information:
PlanetSpace, Inc. (NNJ08ZBG001R)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Outcome: Not Decided Status: Case Currently OpenFiled Date: January 14, 2009
Due: April 24, 2009
Case Type: Bid Protest
GAO Attorney: David A. Ashen
File Number: 401016.1
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 January 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety
January 15, 2009 at 10:11 am | Posted in Aviation Law | Leave a commentby P.J. blount with the blog faculty
The European Parliament passed European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 January 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety (10972/2007 – COM(2007)0325 – C6-0275/2008 – 2007/0111(CNS)) on January 13, 2009:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 January 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety (10972/2007 – COM(2007)0325 – C6-0275/2008 – 2007/0111(CNS))
(Consultation procedure)
The European Parliament ,
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (10972/2007 – COM(2007)0325),
– having regard to Article 80(2), Article 133(4), Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0275/2008),
– having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0468/2008),
1. Approves conclusion of the agreement;
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the United States of America.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

